IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/1174.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Asian trade barriers against primary and processed commodities

Author

Listed:
  • Safadi, Raed
  • Yeats, Alexander

Abstract

Many developing countries are being encouraged to shift toward increased processing and exports of domestically produced natural resource based products now exported in primary form. But in many major markets, the structure of tariffs and nontariff barriers militate against such efforts. Zero or low tariffs are generally applied to industrial countries'imports of primary (unprocessed) commodities; duties increase, or"escalate", as the level of processing or fabrication increases. Tariff escalation produces a trade bias against processed goods. In the past, such trade barrier escalation has been attributed chiefly to industrial countries. The authors examined the structure of restrictions in Asian countries and found that most Asian countries'tariffs incorporated more escalation than do tariffs in industrial countries. Apparently tariff escalation is often reinforced by nontariff barriers on processed goods, although supporting data for this finding are less firm. This issue should be viewed as a North-South issue, contend the authors. A bias against imports of processed goods is built into trade barrier escalation among Asian countries and should be addressed in regional initiatives to liberalize intra-Asian trade barriers. The authors make three recommendations for dealing with escalation issues in multilateral negotiations: Japan, and to a lesser extent, the Republic of Korea are the keys to successful negotiations on these issues, as they have a far greater import bias against processed commodities than do all other countries with which the authors compare them. That is, Japanese and Korean trade barriers incorporate far more escalation than do trade barriers in other countries studied. Disproportionately high cuts in trade barriers for unprocessed commodities are not the solution, as they would increase effective protection for processed goodss. Any approach to trade liberalization should deal with both tariffs and nontariff barriers, to ensure that a reduction in one type of restriction is not offset by a further tightening in the other. Several Asian countries apply both types of restrictions to commodity imports.

Suggested Citation

  • Safadi, Raed & Yeats, Alexander, 1993. "Asian trade barriers against primary and processed commodities," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1174, The World Bank.
  • Handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:1174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/1993/09/01/000009265_3961005055757/Rendered/PDF/multi0page.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Safadi, Raed & Laird, Sam, 1996. "The Uruguay Round agreements: Impact on developing countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 24(7), pages 1223-1242, July.
    2. Aziz, Ahmed Abdul & Denkyirah, Elisha Kwaku & Denkyirah, Elijah Kofi, 2017. "Effect Of Tariff Escalation On Ghanaian Cocoa Exports: An Empirical Perspective," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 5(1), January.
    3. Hecht, Joy E., 1997. "Impacts of tariff escalation on the environment: Literature review and synthesis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(10), pages 1701-1716, October.
    4. Hong Hwang & Chao†Cheng Mai & Shih†Jye Wu, 2017. "Tariff Escalation and Vertical Market Structure," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(8), pages 1597-1613, August.
    5. Badri Narayanan, G. & Khorana, Sangeetha, 2014. "Tariff escalation, export shares and economy-wide welfare: A computable general equilibrium approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 109-118.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:1174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Roula I. Yazigi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dvewbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.