IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/vuw/vuwcsr/19040.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Money and Medicines: An Economic Analysis of Reference Pricing and Related Public-sector Cost-containment Systems for Pharmaceuticals with Special Reference to New Zealand, by Alan Woodfield, John Fountain and Pim Borren (a review)

Author

Listed:
  • Quigley, Neil
  • Evans, Lewis

Abstract

Money and Medicines (WFB) analyses government provision of prescription pharmaceuticals in New Zealand focussing on the performance of the Pharmaceutical Management Agency Ltd. (Pharmac). Pharmac is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Transitional Health Authority (THA) and has the responsibility of managing the national Pharmaceutical Schedule on behalf of the THA. Pharmac does not purchase pharmaceuticals but it does set the terms and conditions under which pharmaceuticals are subsidised to the final consumer. The operation of Pharmac is so closely intertwined with the unique characteristics of the market for pharmaceuticals and government policy towards the health sector that it is not possible to consider any of these individual elements in isolation. The approach adopted by WFB is to weave the key economic and New Zealand institutional factors into all of their discussion and evaluations. To a certain degree this reflects the "Pharmac" focus of the book but makes it more difficult for even an informed reader to understand the scope and insights of their analysis and arguments. Some critical features of the pharmaceutical market are not mentioned until late in the book and on occasions are not drawn out as central issues. We believe that it would have improved the clarity of the arguments made in the book if the authors had written a comprehensive introduction summarising the key characteristics of the pharmaceutical market and Pharmac's role in it. We start by briefly providing such an introduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Quigley, Neil & Evans, Lewis, 1998. "Money and Medicines: An Economic Analysis of Reference Pricing and Related Public-sector Cost-containment Systems for Pharmaceuticals with Special Reference to New Zealand, by Alan Woodfield, John Fou," Working Paper Series 19040, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
  • Handle: RePEc:vuw:vuwcsr:19040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/19040
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sara Ellison Fisher & Iain Cockburn & Zvi Griliches & Jerry Hausman, 1997. "Characteristics of Demand for Pharmaceutical Products: An Examination of Four Cephalosporins," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 28(3), pages 426-446, Autumn.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hostenkamp, Gisela, 2013. "Do follow-on therapeutic substitutes induce price competition between hospital medicines? Evidence from the Danish hospital sector," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 68-77.
    2. Tomaso Duso & Annika Herr & Moritz Suppliet, 2014. "The Welfare Impact Of Parallel Imports: A Structural Approach Applied To The German Market For Oral Anti‐Diabetics," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(9), pages 1036-1057, September.
    3. Farasat A.S. Bokhari, 2013. "What Is The Price Of Pay-To-Delay Deals?," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 9(3), pages 739-753.
    4. Rika Onishi Mortimer, 1998. "Demand for Prescription Drugs: The Effects of Managed Care Pharmacy Benefits," HEW 9802002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Lewis Evans & Neil Quigley & Sayeeda Bano & Nancy Devlin & Alireza Tourani Rad, 1998. "Book reviews," New Zealand Economic Papers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 83-103.
    6. Erik Canton & Ed Westerhout, 1999. "A model for the Dutch pharmaceutical market," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(5), pages 391-402, August.
    7. Avi Dor & William Encinosa, 2010. "How Does Cost‐Sharing Affect Drug Purchases? Insurance Regimes in the Private Market for Prescription Drugs," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(3), pages 545-574, September.
    8. Brekke, Kurt R. & Holmas, Tor Helge & Straume, Odd Rune, 2011. "Reference pricing, competition, and pharmaceutical expenditures: Theory and evidence from a natural experiment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(7), pages 624-638.
    9. Farasat A.S. Bokhari & Franco Mariuzzo & Weijie Yan, 2019. "Antibacterial resistance and the cost of affecting demand: the case of UK antibiotics," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Competition Policy (CCP) 2019-03, Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    10. Guofang Huang & Matthew Shum & Wei Tan, 2019. "Is pharmaceutical detailing informative? Evidence from contraindicated drug prescriptions," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 135-160, June.
    11. Ivan Moreno-Torres, 2011. "Generic drugs in Spain: price competition vs. moral hazard," Working Papers XREAP2011-04, Xarxa de Referència en Economia Aplicada (XREAP), revised May 2011.
    12. Jing Wu & Judy Xu & Gordon Liu & Jiuhong Wu, 2014. "Pharmaceutical Pricing: An Empirical Study of Market Competition in Chinese Hospitals," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 293-303, March.
    13. Iain M. Cockburn & Scott Stern & Jack Zausner, 2011. "Finding the Endless Frontier: Lessons from the Life Sciences Innovation System for Energy R&D," NBER Chapters, in: Accelerating Energy Innovation: Insights from Multiple Sectors, pages 113-157, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Richard T. Thakor & Andrew W. Lo, 2015. "Competition and R&D Financing Decisions: Theory and Evidence from the Biopharmaceutical Industry," NBER Working Papers 20903, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Filippini, M. & Masiero, G. & Moschetti, K., 2009. "Regional consumption of antibiotics: A demand system approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 1389-1397, November.
    16. Stern, S. & Trajtenberg, M., 1998. "Empirical Implications of Physician Authority in Pharmaceutical Decisionmaking," Papers 24-98, Tel Aviv.
    17. Panle Jia & Pinelopi K. Goldberg & Shubham Chaudhuri, 2006. "Estimating the Effects of Global Patent Protection in Pharmaceuticals: A Case Study of Quinolones in India," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(5), pages 1477-1514, December.
    18. Aysegul Timur & Gabriel Picone & Jeffrey DeSimone, 2011. "Has the European union achieved a single pharmaceutical market?," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 223-244, December.
    19. Niklas Rudholm, 2003. "Competition and substitutability in the Swedish pharmaceuticals market," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(14), pages 1609-1617.
    20. Dalen, Dag Morten & Sorisio, Enrico & Strøm, Steinar, 2009. "Choosing among Competing Blockbusters: Does the Identity of the Third-party Payer Matter for Prescribing Doctors?," Memorandum 10/2009, Oslo University, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vuw:vuwcsr:19040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Library Technology Services (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fcvuwnz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.