IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ver/wpaper/07-2023.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

“Monopolistic” vs. “Cooperative” State in the Institutional and Economic Modelling of Antonio De Viti De Marco

Author

Listed:
  • Luca Tedesco

    (University Roma Tre)

  • Roberto Ricciuti

    (Department of Economics (University of Verona))

Abstract

Antonio de Viti de Marco was one of the most representative figures of the Italian school of public finance and is considered an intellectual father of the Public Choice school. In this paper we analyze the relationships between his theories and those of Herbert Spencer, explicitly cited by de Viti de Marco in his writings. We also explore to what extent the theory fueled the political and journalistic campaigns in which he was engaged, seeking to influence the economic and financial policy of the government. De Viti de Marco and his associates proposed a way out of the fin de siècle crisis based on a new fiscal pact and free trade, which in turn was grounded on a view of the British model that was already in crisis in its homeland. Unsurprisingly, this route was not chosen by the government, which opted for repression.

Suggested Citation

  • Luca Tedesco & Roberto Ricciuti, 2023. "“Monopolistic” vs. “Cooperative” State in the Institutional and Economic Modelling of Antonio De Viti De Marco," Working Papers 07/2023, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ver:wpaper:07/2023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dse.univr.it/home/workingpapers/wp2023n7.pdf
    File Function: First version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martelloni, Francesco & Mosca, Manuela, 2018. "De Viti De Marco, The €Œeuropean War,€ And President Wilson," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(2), pages 179-199, June.
    2. Fossati, Amedeo, 2006. "Needs, the Principle of Minimum Means, and Public Goods in de Viti de Marco," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(4), pages 427-438, December.
    3. Jürgen G. Backhaus & Richard E. Wagner, 2005. "From Continental Public Finance to Public Choice: Mapping Continuity," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 37(5), pages 314-332, Supplemen.
    4. Michele G. Giuranno & Manuela Mosca, 2018. "Political realism and models of the state: Antonio de Viti de Marco and the origins of public choice," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 325-345, June.
    5. Fossati, Amedeo & Montefiori, Marcello, 2019. "Antonio De Viti De Marco, The Principle Of Minimum Means, And Political Competition," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(2), pages 237-253, June.
    6. Giuseppe Eusepi & Richard E. Wagner, 2013. "Tax Prices in a Democratic Polity: The Continuing Relevance of Antonio de Viti de Marco," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 45(1), pages 99-121, Spring.
    7. Manuela Mosca, 2010. "Emil Sax and Italy. Three episodes," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(2), pages 47-62.
    8. Claudia Sunna & Manuela Mosca, 2017. "Heterogenesis of ends: Herbert Spencer and the Italian economists," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 25-57, January.
    9. Manuela Mosca, 2016. "Antonio de Viti de Marco as a Political Commentator in the Daily Press," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(1), pages 43-63.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fossati, Amedeo, 2022. "Of Public Choice and Antonio De Viti de Marco," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 75(4), pages 519-544.
    2. Amedeo Fossati, 2016. "The First Principles of Public Finance by Antonio de Viti de Marco: Is There Any Disparity between the Assessments of the Italian and the English Speaking Scholars?," STUDI ECONOMICI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(118-119-1), pages 88-110.
    3. Amedeo Fossati & Marcello Montefiori, 2016. "Antonio De Viti de Marco, political competition, and the principle of minimum means," Working papers 49, Società Italiana di Economia Pubblica.
    4. Manuela Mosca, 2016. "Antonio de Viti de Marco as a Political Commentator in the Daily Press," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(1), pages 43-63.
    5. Richard Wagner, 2013. "What kind of state in our future? Fact and Conjecture in Vito Tanzi’s Government versus Markets," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 26(1), pages 93-104, March.
    6. Manuela Mosca, 2021. "The decades of silence Antonio de Viti de Marco from 1923 to 1943," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 10(1), pages 31-61.
    7. Michele G. Giuranno & Manuela Mosca, 2018. "Political realism and models of the state: Antonio de Viti de Marco and the origins of public choice," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 325-345, June.
    8. Mosca, Manuela, 2013. "The daily battles of Antonio de Viti de Marco," MPRA Paper 47963, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Giuseppe Eusepi & Richard Wagner, 2012. "Indebted state versus intermediary state: who owes what to whom?," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 199-212, September.
    10. Richard E. Wagner, 2019. "American Democracy and the Problem of Fiscal Deficits," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 15(2), pages 199-216, December.
    11. Richard E. Wagner, 2012. "Deficits, Debt, and Democracy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14477.
    12. Alexander William Salter, 2016. "Political Property Rights and Governance Outcomes: A Theory of the Corporate Polity," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 31(Winter 20), pages 1-20.
    13. Alexander W. Salter, 2020. "Private Prerogative, Public Purpose: Political Entrepreneurship and Management in Frederick the Great’s Anti-Machiavel," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 35(Spring 20), pages 1-28.
    14. Giuranno, Michele G. & Nocco, Antonella, 2020. "Trade tariff, wage gap and public spending," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 167-179.
    15. Richard Wagner, 2014. "James Buchanan’s public debt theory: a rational reconstruction," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 253-264, September.
    16. Furton Glenn L. & Salter Alexander William, 2017. "Private Governance and the Pricing of Political Enterprises," Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 12(s1), pages 1-9, July.
    17. Giuseppe Eusepi, 2020. "From subjectivism to constitutionalism: the intellectual journey of James M. Buchanan through his Italian heroes," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 183(3), pages 273-285, June.
    18. Alberto Mingardi, 2017. "Classical Liberalism in Italian Economic Thought, from the Time of Unification," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22–54, January.
    19. Cardoso, José Luís & Lains, Pedro, 2009. "Paying for the liberal state : the rise of public finance in nineteenth century Europe," IFCS - Working Papers in Economic History.WH wp09-03, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Instituto Figuerola.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    De Viti de Marco; liberal Italy; public finance; taxation; free trade; protectionism; Italian economic thought.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B13 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Neoclassical through 1925 (Austrian, Marshallian, Walrasian, Wicksellian)
    • B31 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought: Individuals - - - Individuals
    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
    • D78 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation
    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ver:wpaper:07/2023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael Reiter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isverit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.