Tying up the loose ends in simple correspondence analysis
AbstractAlthough correspondence analysis is now widely available in statistical software packages and applied in a variety of contexts, notably the social and environmental sciences, there are still some misconceptions about this method as well as unresolved issues which remain controversial to this day. In this paper we hope to settle these matters, namely (i) the way CA measures variance in a two-way table and how to compare variances between tables of different sizes, (ii) the influence, or rather lack of influence, of outliers in the usual CA maps, (iii) the scaling issue and the biplot interpretation of maps,(iv) whether or not to rotate a solution, and (v) statistical significance of results.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra in its series Economics Working Papers with number 940.
Date of creation: Jan 2006
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.econ.upf.edu/
Biplot; bootstrapping; canonical correlation; chi-square distance; confidence; ellipse; contingency table; convex hull; correspondence analysis; inertia; randomization test; rotation; singular value;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- C19 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Other
- C88 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Other Computer Software
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- K. Ruben Gabriel, 2002. "Goodness of fit of biplots and correspondence analysis," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 89(2), pages 423-436, June.
- John Aitchison & Michael Greenacre, 2002.
"Biplots of compositional data,"
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C,
Royal Statistical Society, vol. 51(4), pages 375-392.
- Michael Greenacre, 2008. "Correspondence analysis of raw data," Economics Working Papers 1112, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Jul 2009.
- Marie Chavent & Vanessa Kuentz-Simonet & Jérôme Saracco, 2012. "Orthogonal rotation in PCAMIX," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 131-146, July.
- Polak, Marike & Heiser, Willem J. & de Rooij, Mark, 2009. "Two types of single-peaked data: Correspondence analysis as an alternative to principal component analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 3117-3128, June.
- Urbano Lorenzo-Seva & Michel van de Velden & Henk A. L. Kiers, . "CAR: A MATLAB Package to Compute Correspondence Analysis with Rotations," Journal of Statistical Software, American Statistical Association, vol. 31(i08).
- Lorenzo-Seva, U. & van de Velden, M. & Kiers, H.A.L., 2007. "Oblique rotation in correspondence analysis: a step forward in the simplest interpretation," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2007-25, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.