IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tsa/wpaper/0218is.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Information Security Subcultures of Professional Groups in Organizations: A Conceptual Framework

Author

Listed:
  • V. Srinivasan (Chino) Rao

    (UTSA)

  • Sriraman Ramachandran
  • Diane Walz

Abstract

The need for a strong security culture in organizations has been emphasized by many researchers. Cultures in some organizations are known to be differentiated, i.e., there may be variations in cultures across professional groups within a single organization. The (sub)culture of a professional group in an organization is influenced by many factors. In the current article, we propose a theory-based conceptual framework for security subcultures of professional groups in organizations. The framework relates security subcultures to its antecedents. We emphasize the importance of examining security culture at the subculture level, the need to consider the security-based beliefs (espoused security subculture) separately from the security-based behaviors (enacted security subculture), and, to account for the conflicts between security and performance expectations.

Suggested Citation

  • V. Srinivasan (Chino) Rao & Sriraman Ramachandran & Diane Walz, 2013. "Information Security Subcultures of Professional Groups in Organizations: A Conceptual Framework," Working Papers 0218is, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    • Handle: RePEc:tsa:wpaper:0218is
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://interim.business.utsa.edu/wps/is/0044IS-019-2013.pdf
    File Function: Full text Classification- L86; C8; L80
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John M. Jermier & John W. Slocum & Louis W. Fry & Jeannie Gaines, 1991. "Organizational Subcultures in a Soft Bureaucracy: Resistance Behind the Myth and Facade of an Official Culture," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(2), pages 170-194, May.
    2. Dorothy Leonard-Barton & Isabelle Deschamps, 1988. "Managerial Influence in the Implementation of New Technology," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(10), pages 1252-1265, October.
    3. Russell L. Purvis & V. Sambamurthy & Robert W. Zmud, 2001. "The Assimilation of Knowledge Platforms in Organizations: An Empirical Investigation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 117-135, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elbanna, Amany & Newman, Mike, 2022. "The bright side and the dark side of top management support in Digital Transformaion –A hermeneutical reading," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Wang, Qiong & Bradford, Kevin & Xu, Jun & Weitz, Barton, 2008. "Creativity in buyer–seller relationships: The role of governance," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 109-118.
    3. Adi Alsyouf & Awanis Ku Ishak & Abdalwali Lutfi & Fahad Nasser Alhazmi & Manaf Al-Okaily, 2022. "The Role of Personality and Top Management Support in Continuance Intention to Use Electronic Health Record Systems among Nurses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-30, September.
    4. Claude Paraponaris, 2017. "Plateformes numériques, conception ouverte et emploi," Post-Print halshs-01614430, HAL.
    5. Venugopal Gopalakrishna-Remani & Robert Paul Jones & Kerri M. Camp, 2019. "Levels of EMR Adoption in U.S. Hospitals: An Empirical Examination of Absorptive Capacity, Institutional Pressures, Top Management Beliefs, and Participation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 1325-1344, December.
    6. Ryan Mullins & Raj Agnihotri, 2022. "Digital selling: organizational and managerial influences for frontline readiness and effectiveness," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 800-821, July.
    7. Hervas-Oliver, Jose-Luis & Sempere-Ripoll, Francisca & Boronat-Moll, Carles, 2012. "Process innovation objectives and management complementarities: patterns, drivers, co-adoption and performance effects," MERIT Working Papers 2012-051, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    8. Rezvani, Azadeh & Dong, Linying & Khosravi, Pouria, 2017. "Promoting the continuing usage of strategic information systems: The role of supervisory leadership in the successful implementation of enterprise systems," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 417-430.
    9. Attié, Elodie & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy ca," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    10. Sven Heidenreich & Katrin Talke, 2020. "Consequences of mandated usage of innovations in organizations: developing an innovation decision model of symbolic and forced adoption," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 279-298, December.
    11. Lahuddin, Harlinda & Modding, H. Basri & Semmaila, H. Baharuddin & Lamo, H. Muchtar & Jamali, Hisnol, 2018. "Effect of management support and user participation on implementation of information systems success and undergraduate programs performance," INA-Rxiv 5cbx3, Center for Open Science.
    12. L Georg-Schaffner & Enrico Prinz, 2021. "Corporate management boards’ information security orientation: an analysis of cybersecurity incidents in DAX 30 companies," Post-Print hal-03706640, HAL.
    13. V. S. Prakash Attili & Saji K. Mathew & Vijayan Sugumaran, 2022. "Information Privacy Assimilation in IT Organizations," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 1497-1513, October.
    14. Ujwal Kayande & Arnaud De Bruyn & Gary L. Lilien & Arvind Rangaswamy & Gerrit H. van Bruggen, 2009. "How Incorporating Feedback Mechanisms in a DSS Affects DSS Evaluations," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 527-546, December.
    15. Sharath Sasidharan & Radhika Santhanam & Daniel J. Brass & Vallabh Sambamurthy, 2012. "The Effects of Social Network Structure on Enterprise Systems Success: A Longitudinal Multilevel Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(3-part-1), pages 658-678, September.
    16. Lahuddin, Harlinda & Gani, Ahmad & Nujum, Syamsu & Modding, H. Basri & Jamali, Hisnol, 2018. "Effect of management support and user participation on implementation of information systems success and undergraduate programs performance," INA-Rxiv p7fm4, Center for Open Science.
    17. Galazka, Anna Milena., 2015. "Report on the global survey into the use of information and communication technologies in national labour administration systems," ILO Working Papers 994891643402676, International Labour Organization.
    18. L. Georg-Schaffner & E. Prinz, 2022. "Corporate management boards’ information security orientation: an analysis of cybersecurity incidents in DAX 30 companies," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(4), pages 1375-1408, December.
    19. Elbashir, Mohamed Z. & Collier, Philip A. & Davern, Michael J., 2008. "Measuring the effects of business intelligence systems: The relationship between business process and organizational performance," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 135-153.
    20. Turner, Karynne L. & Monti, Alberto & Annosi, Maria Carmela, 2021. "Disentangling the effects of organizational controls on innovation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 57-69.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Information Security; Organizations;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tsa:wpaper:0218is. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wendy Frost (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbutsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.