This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

An Economic Approach to Article 82 - Report by the European Advisory Group on Competition Policy

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Jordi Gual (IESE Business School, University of Navarra, Avenida Pearson 21, 08034 Barcelona, Spain, gual@lacaixa.es)
Martin Hellwig (Max Planck Institute on Collective Goods, Kurt Schumacher Str. 10, 53110 Bonn, Germany, hellwig@mpp-rdg.mpg.de)
Anne Perrot (Conseil de la concurrence, 11 rue de l'Echelle, 75 001 Paris, France, anne.perrot@conseil-concurrence.fr)
Michele Polo (IGIER, Università Bocconi, Via Salasco 5, 20136 Milan, Italy, michele.polo@uni-bocconi.it)
Patrick Rey (IDEI, University of Toulouse I, 31042 Toulouse Cedex, France, prey@cict.fr)
Klaus Schmidt (Department of Economics, University of Munich, Ludwigstr. 28, 80539 München, Germany, klaus.schmidt@lrz.uni-muenchen.de)
Rune Stenbacka (Department of Economics, Swedish School of Economics, P.O. Box 479, 00101 Helsinki, Finland, stenback@hanken.fi)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

This report argues in favour of an economics-based approach to Article 82, in a way similar to the reform of Article 81 and merger control. In particular, we support an effects-based rather than a form-based approach to competition policy. Such an approach focuses on the presence of anti-competitive effects that harm consumers, and is based on the examination of each specific case, based on sound economics and grounded on facts.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.sfbtr15.de/dipa/82.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich in its series Discussion Papers with number 82.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: Jul 2005
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:trf:wpaper:82

Contact details of provider:
Postal: D-68131 Mannheim
Fax: +49 621 181-2785
Email:
Web page: http://www.sfbtr15.de/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Claudia Jung).

Related research
Keywords: Competition Policy Abuse of Market Power Article 82

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:
D4 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure and Pricing

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
  1. Giovanni Immordino & Marco Pagano & Michele Polo, . "Norm Flexibility and Private Initiative," Working Papers 314, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  2. Karlinger, Liliane & Motta, Massimo, 2007. "Exclusionary Pricing and Rebates When Scale Matters," CEPR Discussion Papers 6258, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  3. Niels Krap & Johannes Stephan, 2008. "The Relationship between Knowledge Intensity and Market Concentration in European Industries: An inverted U-Shape," IWH Discussion Papers 3-08, Halle Institute for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
  4. Kresimir Zigic & Viatcheslav Vinogradov & Eugen Kovac, 2006. "Persistence of Monopoly, Innovation, and R-and-D Spillovers: Static versus Dynamic Analysis," Computing in Economics and Finance 2006 516, Society for Computational Economics. [Downloadable!]
  5. Giovanni Immordino & Michele Polo, 2008. "Judicial Errors and Innovative Activity," CSEF Working Papers 196, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Salerno, Italy, revised 18 Jul 2008. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You may want to explore EconPapers, which displays the same data as IDEAS in a different way.

This page was last updated on 2008-9-25.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.