IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tiu/tiutis/c0e2bc10-e550-4cf2-b649-6452dfea1ffe.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Experimental Design for Sensitivity Analysis, Optimization and Validation of Simulation Models

Author

Listed:
  • Kleijnen, J.P.C.

    (Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Kleijnen, J.P.C., 1997. "Experimental Design for Sensitivity Analysis, Optimization and Validation of Simulation Models," Other publications TiSEM c0e2bc10-e550-4cf2-b649-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    • Handle: RePEc:tiu:tiutis:c0e2bc10-e550-4cf2-b649-6452dfea1ffe
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://pure.uvt.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/527135/52.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kleijnen, J.P.C., 1995. "Sensitivity analysis and optimization of system dynamics models : Regression analysis and statistical design of experiments," Other publications TiSEM 87ee6ee0-592c-4204-ac50-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Kleijnen, Jack P. C., 1995. "Verification and validation of simulation models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 145-162, April.
    3. F. L. Gunther & R. W. Wolff, 1980. "The Almost Regenerative Method for Stochastic System Simulations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 375-386, April.
    4. Kleijnen, J.P.C. & van Groenendaal, W.J.H., 1992. "Two-stage versus sequential sample-size determination in regression analysis of simulation experiments," Research Memorandum FEW 572, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. M. Hossein Safizadeh & Robert Signorile, 1994. "Optimization of Simulation via Quasi-Newton Methods," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 6(4), pages 398-408, November.
    6. Christine A. Fossett & Dale Harrison & Harry Weintrob & Saul I. Gass, 1991. "An Assessment Procedure for Simulation Models: A Case Study," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(5), pages 710-723, October.
    7. Michael Pinedo & Ronald W. Wolff, 1982. "A Comparison Between Tandem Queues with Dependent and Independent Service Times," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 464-479, June.
    8. Jack P. C. Kleijnen, 1975. "A Comment on Blanning's “Metamodel for Sensitivity Analysis: The Regression Metamodel in Simulation”," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 21-23, May.
    9. Jack P. C. Kleijnen, 1992. "Regression Metamodels for Simulation with Common Random Numbers: Comparison of Validation Tests and Confidence Intervals," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(8), pages 1164-1185, August.
    10. Peter W. Glynn & Donald L. Iglehart, 1989. "Importance Sampling for Stochastic Simulations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(11), pages 1367-1392, November.
    11. Kleijnen, Jack P. C. & Sargent, Robert G., 2000. "A methodology for fitting and validating metamodels in simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 14-29, January.
    12. Kleijnen, Jack P. C. & Standridge, Charles R., 1988. "Experimental design and regression analysis in simulation: An FMS case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 257-261, February.
    13. Kleijnen, J.P.C. & Bettonvil, B.W.M., 1997. "Searching for important factors in simulation models with many factors : Sequential bifurcation," Other publications TiSEM be826993-22f9-4cb3-89df-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    14. Bettonvil, Bert & Kleijnen, Jack P. C., 1997. "Searching for important factors in simulation models with many factors: Sequential bifurcation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 180-194, January.
    15. Saltelli, A. & Andres, T. H. & Homma, T., 1995. "Sensitivity analysis of model output. Performance of the iterated fractional factorial design method," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 387-407, October.
    16. van Ham, G. & Rotmans, J. & Kleijnen, J.P.C., 1992. "Techniques for sensitivity analysis of simulation models : A case study of the CO2 greenhouse effect," Other publications TiSEM 71317a03-3399-4554-83cb-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    17. Kleijnen, J.P.C., 1995. "Statistical validation of simulation models : A case study," Other publications TiSEM 4da192cf-c3f4-40a4-aea4-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Sherif, Yosef S. & Boice, Bruce A., 1994. "Optimization by pattern search," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 78(3), pages 277-303, November.
    19. Jack P. C. Kleijnen, 1975. "Antithetic Variates, Common Random Numbers and Optimal Computer Time Allocation in Simulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(10), pages 1176-1185, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Neddermeijer, H.G. & Piersma, N. & van Oortmarssen, G.J. & Habbema, J.D.F. & Dekker, R., 1999. "Comparison of response surface methodology and the Nelder and Mead simplex method for optimization in microsimulation models," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 9924-/A, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kleijnen, Jack P. C. & Sargent, Robert G., 2000. "A methodology for fitting and validating metamodels in simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 14-29, January.
    2. Batmaz, Inci & Tunali, Semra, 2003. "Small response surface designs for metamodel estimation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 455-470, March.
    3. Kleijnen, J.P.C., 1995. "Sensitivity analysis and optimization of system dynamics models : Regression analysis and statistical design of experiments," Other publications TiSEM 87ee6ee0-592c-4204-ac50-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Jack P. C. Kleijnen & Susan M. Sanchez & Thomas W. Lucas & Thomas M. Cioppa, 2005. "State-of-the-Art Review: A User’s Guide to the Brave New World of Designing Simulation Experiments," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 263-289, August.
    5. Kleijnen, J.P.C. & Sanchez, S.M. & Lucas, T.W. & Cioppa, T.M., 2003. "A User's Guide to the Brave New World of Designing Simulation Experiments," Discussion Paper 2003-1, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    6. Kleijnen, J.P.C., 2006. "White Noise Assumptions Revisited : Regression Models and Statistical Designs for Simulation Practice," Other publications TiSEM d8c37ad3-f9a5-4824-986d-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Xuefei Lu & Alessandro Rudi & Emanuele Borgonovo & Lorenzo Rosasco, 2020. "Faster Kriging: Facing High-Dimensional Simulators," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 233-249, January.
    8. Kleijnen, J. P. C., 2001. "Ethical issues in modeling: Some reflections," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 223-230, April.
    9. Jin, Ding & Hedtrich, Johannes & Henning, Christian, 2018. "Applying Meta modeling for extended CGE-modeling: Sample techniques and potential application," Conference papers 332947, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    10. Shi, Wen & Kleijnen, J.P.C., 2017. "Testing the Assumptions of Sequential Bifurcation for Factor Screening (revision of CentER DP 2015-034)," Other publications TiSEM 763fd6f8-b618-4b06-a284-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. Shi, Wen & Shang, Jennifer & Liu, Zhixue & Zuo, Xiaolu, 2014. "Optimal design of the auto parts supply chain for JIT operations: Sequential bifurcation factor screening and multi-response surface methodology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(2), pages 664-676.
    12. Kleijnen, J.P.C., 2006. "Regression Models and Experimental Designs : A Tutorial for Simulation Analaysts," Discussion Paper 2006-10, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    13. Ilan Halachmi & Yitzhak Simon & Noam Mozes, 2014. "Simulation of the shift from marine netcages to inland recirculating aquaculture systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 219(1), pages 85-99, August.
    14. Kleijnen, Jack P. C., 2005. "An overview of the design and analysis of simulation experiments for sensitivity analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(2), pages 287-300, July.
    15. H. Christopher Frey & Sumeet R. Patil, 2002. "Identification and Review of Sensitivity Analysis Methods," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 553-578, June.
    16. Tunali, S. & Batmaz, I., 2003. "A metamodeling methodology involving both qualitative and quantitative input factors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(2), pages 437-450, October.
    17. Jin, Ding & Thube, Sneha Dattatraya & Hedtrich, Johannes & Henning, Christian & Delzeit, Ruth, 2019. "A Baseline Calibration Procedure for CGE models: An Application for DART," Conference papers 333057, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    18. Durieux, Severine & Pierreval, Henri, 2004. "Regression metamodeling for the design of automated manufacturing system composed of parallel machines sharing a material handling resource," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 21-30, May.
    19. Van Groenendaal, Willem J. H. & Kleijnen, Jack P. C., 2002. "Deterministic versus stochastic sensitivity analysis in investment problems: An environmental case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 8-20, August.
    20. Strang, Kenneth David, 2012. "Importance of verifying queue model assumptions before planning with simulation software," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 493-504.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tiu:tiutis:c0e2bc10-e550-4cf2-b649-6452dfea1ffe. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Richard Broekman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.tilburguniversity.edu/about/schools/economics-and-management/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.