IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tin/wpaper/19970129.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluation of a New Maintenance Concept for the Preservation of Highways

Author

Listed:
  • Rommert Dekker
  • Raymond Ph. Plasmeijer

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam)

  • Jan H. Swart

    (Ministry of Waterways & Public Works, Delft)

Abstract

Asphalt roads are gradually deteriorating over time and need road mending to remain in a good state. Inspections are performed to obtain information about the current state of the road; when the damage achieves the established standards, the road is repaired through a maintenance action that is considered as most cost-effective. Because of economies of scale it is to a certain extent economical to limit the number of maintenance services by integrating neighboring segments into a homogeneous section which is completely repaired. In this report we consider the question whether it is economically justified to adopt a maintenance concept in which the road is occasionally regenerated from junction to junction with a distance of several kilometers. The big advantage of junction-to-junction maintenance is that it can be done within special road barrier constructions which reduce the road capacity only slightly, so that the road can be maintained 24 hours a day.

Suggested Citation

  • Rommert Dekker & Raymond Ph. Plasmeijer & Jan H. Swart, 1997. "Evaluation of a New Maintenance Concept for the Preservation of Highways," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 97-129/4, Tinbergen Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:19970129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.tinbergen.nl/97129.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rommert Dekker & Ralph Wildeman & Frank Duyn Schouten, 1997. "A review of multi-component maintenance models with economic dependence," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 45(3), pages 411-435, October.
    2. Cho, Danny I. & Parlar, Mahmut, 1991. "A survey of maintenance models for multi-unit systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 1-23, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ricardo Gonçalves & António Gomes, 2012. "Maintenance Incentives in Highway Concession Contracts," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 46(1), pages 99-122, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bruns, Peter, 2002. "Optimal maintenance strategies for systems with partial repair options and without assuming bounded costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 146-165, May.
    2. Seyed Habib A. Rahmati & Abbas Ahmadi & Kannan Govindan, 2018. "A novel integrated condition-based maintenance and stochastic flexible job shop scheduling problem: simulation-based optimization approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 583-621, October.
    3. Lu, Biao & Zhou, Xiaojun, 2017. "Opportunistic preventive maintenance scheduling for serial-parallel multistage manufacturing systems with multiple streams of deterioration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 116-127.
    4. Liu, Xinbao & Yang, Tianji & Pei, Jun & Liao, Haitao & Pohl, Edward A., 2019. "Replacement and inventory control for a multi-customer product service system with decreasing replacement costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 561-574.
    5. Briš, Radim & Byczanski, Petr & Goňo, Radomír & Rusek, Stanislav, 2017. "Discrete maintenance optimization of complex multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 80-89.
    6. Markus Bohlin & Mathias Wärja, 2015. "Maintenance optimization with duration-dependent costs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 224(1), pages 1-23, January.
    7. Jyrki Savolainen & Michele Urbani, 2021. "Maintenance optimization for a multi-unit system with digital twin simulation," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(7), pages 1953-1973, October.
    8. Maaroufi, Ghofrane & Chelbi, Anis & Rezg, Nidhal, 2013. "Optimal selective renewal policy for systems subject to propagated failures with global effect and failure isolation phenomena," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 61-70.
    9. Das, K. & Lashkari, R.S. & Sengupta, S., 2007. "Machine reliability and preventive maintenance planning for cellular manufacturing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(1), pages 162-180, November.
    10. Bouvard, K. & Artus, S. & Bérenguer, C. & Cocquempot, V., 2011. "Condition-based dynamic maintenance operations planning & grouping. Application to commercial heavy vehicles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(6), pages 601-610.
    11. Olde Keizer, Minou C.A. & Teunter, Ruud H. & Veldman, Jasper, 2017. "Joint condition-based maintenance and inventory optimization for systems with multiple components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(1), pages 209-222.
    12. Robin P. Nicolai & Rommert Dekker, 2008. "Optimal Maintenance of Multi-component Systems: A Review," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Complex System Maintenance Handbook, chapter 11, pages 263-286, Springer.
    13. Petchrompo, Sanyapong & Parlikad, Ajith Kumar, 2019. "A review of asset management literature on multi-asset systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 181-201.
    14. Zhuoqi Zhang & Su Wu & Binfeng Li & Seungchul Lee, 2015. "(, ) type maintenance policy for multi-component systems with failure interactions," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(6), pages 1051-1064, April.
    15. Berrade, M.D. & Scarf, P.A. & Cavalcante, C.A.V., 2018. "Conditional inspection and maintenance of a system with two interacting components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(2), pages 533-544.
    16. Jaturonnatee, J. & Murthy, D.N.P. & Boondiskulchok, R., 2006. "Optimal preventive maintenance of leased equipment with corrective minimal repairs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(1), pages 201-215, October.
    17. Soo-Haeng Cho & Kevin F. McCardle, 2009. "The Adoption of Multiple Dependent Technologies," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 157-169, February.
    18. Jiawen Hu & Zuhua Jiang & Haitao Liao, 2017. "Preventive maintenance of a batch production system under time-varying operational condition," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(19), pages 5681-5705, October.
    19. de Jonge, Bram & Klingenberg, Warse & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2016. "Reducing costs by clustering maintenance activities for multiple critical units," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 93-103.
    20. Zhang, Xiaohong & Zeng, Jianchao, 2017. "Joint optimization of condition-based opportunistic maintenance and spare parts provisioning policy in multiunit systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 479-498.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:19970129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tinbenl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.