IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v32y2021i7d10.1007_s10845-021-01740-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maintenance optimization for a multi-unit system with digital twin simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Jyrki Savolainen

    (Lappeenranta University of Technology, School of Business and Management)

  • Michele Urbani

    (University of Trento)

Abstract

Optimization of operations and maintenance (O&M) in the industry is a topic that has been largely studied in the literature. Many authors focused on reliability-based approaches to optimize O&M, but little attention has been given to study the influence of macroeconomic variables on the long-term maintenance policy. This work aims to optimize time-based maintenance (TBM) policy in the mining industry. The mine environment is reproduced employing a virtual model that resembles a digital twin (DT) of the system. The effect of maintenance decisions is replicated by a discrete event simulation (DES), whereas a model of the financial operability of the mine is realized through System Dynamics (SD). The simultaneous use of DES and the SD allows us to reproduce the environment with high-fidelity and to minimize the cost of O&M. The selected illustrative case example demonstrates that the proposed approach is feasible. The issues of using high dimensional simulation data from DT-models in managerial decision making is identified and discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Jyrki Savolainen & Michele Urbani, 2021. "Maintenance optimization for a multi-unit system with digital twin simulation," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(7), pages 1953-1973, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:32:y:2021:i:7:d:10.1007_s10845-021-01740-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-021-01740-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-021-01740-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-021-01740-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kendrik Yan Hong Lim & Pai Zheng & Chun-Hsien Chen, 2020. "A state-of-the-art survey of Digital Twin: techniques, engineering product lifecycle management and business innovation perspectives," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 1313-1337, August.
    2. Robin P. Nicolai & Rommert Dekker, 2008. "Optimal Maintenance of Multi-component Systems: A Review," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Complex System Maintenance Handbook, chapter 11, pages 263-286, Springer.
    3. Rossen, Anja, 2015. "What are metal prices like? Co-movement, price cycles and long-run trends," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 255-276.
    4. Wang, Hongzhou, 2002. "A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 469-489, June.
    5. Rommert Dekker & Ralph Wildeman & Frank Duyn Schouten, 1997. "A review of multi-component maintenance models with economic dependence," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 45(3), pages 411-435, October.
    6. Zio, E., 2009. "Reliability engineering: Old problems and new challenges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 125-141.
    7. Georgios D. Kontes & Georgios I. Giannakis & Víctor Sánchez & Pablo De Agustin-Camacho & Ander Romero-Amorrortu & Natalia Panagiotidou & Dimitrios V. Rovas & Simone Steiger & Christopher Mutschler & G, 2018. "Simulation-Based Evaluation and Optimization of Control Strategies in Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, December.
    8. Lianhui Li & Chunlei Mao & Hongxia Sun & Yiping Yuan & Bingbing Lei, 2020. "Digital Twin Driven Green Performance Evaluation Methodology of Intelligent Manufacturing: Hybrid Model Based on Fuzzy Rough-Sets AHP, Multistage Weight Synthesis, and PROMETHEE II," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-24, July.
    9. Jyrki Savolainen & Mikael Collan & Pasi Luukka, 2017. "Analyzing operational real options in metal mining investments with a system dynamic model," The Engineering Economist, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(1), pages 54-72, January.
    10. Labys, W. C. & Achouch, A. & Terraza, M., 1999. "Metal prices and the business cycle," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 229-238, December.
    11. Roberts, Mark C., 2009. "Duration and characteristics of metal price cycles," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 87-102, September.
    12. Topal, Erkan & Ramazan, Salih, 2010. "A new MIP model for mine equipment scheduling by minimizing maintenance cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 1065-1071, December.
    13. A. J. H. Redelinghuys & A. H. Basson & K. Kruger, 2020. "A six-layer architecture for the digital twin: a manufacturing case study implementation," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 1383-1402, August.
    14. Inthavongsa, Inthanongsone & Drebenstedt, Carsten & Bongaerts, Jan & Sontamino, Phongpat, 2016. "Real options decision framework: Strategic operating policies for open pit mine planning," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 142-153.
    15. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    16. Cho, Danny I. & Parlar, Mahmut, 1991. "A survey of maintenance models for multi-unit systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 1-23, March.
    17. Alrabghi, Abdullah & Tiwari, Ashutosh, 2016. "A novel approach for modelling complex maintenance systems using discrete event simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 160-170.
    18. Balbir S. Dhillon, 2008. "Mining Equipment Reliability, Maintainability, and Safety," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, number 978-1-84800-288-3, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Madhusudanan Navinchandran & Michael E. Sharp & Michael P. Brundage & Thurston B. Sexton, 2022. "Discovering critical KPI factors from natural language in maintenance work orders," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(6), pages 1859-1877, August.
    2. Leoni, Leonardo & De Carlo, Filippo & Tucci, Mario, 2023. "Developing a framework for generating production-dependent failure rate through discrete-event simulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    3. Ágota Bányai, 2021. "Energy Consumption-Based Maintenance Policy Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-33, September.
    4. Neto, Anis Assad & Ribeiro da Silva, Elias & Deschamps, Fernando & do Nascimento Junior, Laercio Alves & Pinheiro de Lima, Edson, 2023. "Modeling production disorder: Procedures for digital twins of flexibility-driven manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Petchrompo, Sanyapong & Parlikad, Ajith Kumar, 2019. "A review of asset management literature on multi-asset systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 181-201.
    2. Urbani, Michele & Brunelli, Matteo & Punkka, Antti, 2023. "An approach for bi-objective maintenance scheduling on a networked system with limited resources," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(1), pages 101-113.
    3. Lu, Biao & Zhou, Xiaojun, 2017. "Opportunistic preventive maintenance scheduling for serial-parallel multistage manufacturing systems with multiple streams of deterioration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 116-127.
    4. Briš, Radim & Byczanski, Petr & Goňo, Radomír & Rusek, Stanislav, 2017. "Discrete maintenance optimization of complex multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 80-89.
    5. de Jonge, Bram & Klingenberg, Warse & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2016. "Reducing costs by clustering maintenance activities for multiple critical units," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 93-103.
    6. Zhang, Xiaohong & Zeng, Jianchao, 2017. "Joint optimization of condition-based opportunistic maintenance and spare parts provisioning policy in multiunit systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 479-498.
    7. Barlow, E. & Bedford, T. & Revie, M. & Tan, J. & Walls, L., 2021. "A performance-centred approach to optimising maintenance of complex systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 579-595.
    8. Olde Keizer, Minou C.A. & Flapper, Simme Douwe P. & Teunter, Ruud H., 2017. "Condition-based maintenance policies for systems with multiple dependent components: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 405-420.
    9. V Zille & C Bérenguer & A Grall & A Despujols, 2011. "Modelling multicomponent systems to quantify reliability centred maintenance strategies," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 225(2), pages 141-160, June.
    10. Seyedhosseini, Seyed Mohammad & Moakedi, Hamid & Shahanaghi, Kamran, 2018. "Imperfect inspection optimization for a two-component system subject to hidden and two-stage revealed failures over a finite time horizon," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 141-156.
    11. Retsef Levi & Thomas Magnanti & Yaron Shaposhnik, 2019. "Scheduling with Testing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 776-793, February.
    12. Zhang, Xiaohong & Zeng, Jianchao, 2015. "A general modeling method for opportunistic maintenance modeling of multi-unit systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 176-190.
    13. Wang, Ling & Chu, Jian & Mao, Weijie, 2009. "A condition-based replacement and spare provisioning policy for deteriorating systems with uncertain deterioration to failure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(1), pages 184-205, April.
    14. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    15. Seyed Habib A. Rahmati & Abbas Ahmadi & Kannan Govindan, 2018. "A novel integrated condition-based maintenance and stochastic flexible job shop scheduling problem: simulation-based optimization approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 583-621, October.
    16. Dilaver, Halit Metehan & Akçay, Alp & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2023. "Integrated planning of asset-use and dry-docking for a fleet of maritime assets," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    17. Baffes, John & Kabundi, Alain, 2023. "Commodity price shocks: Order within chaos?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    18. Markus Bohlin & Mathias Wärja, 2015. "Maintenance optimization with duration-dependent costs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 224(1), pages 1-23, January.
    19. Vu, Hai Canh & Do, Phuc & Barros, Anne & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2014. "Maintenance grouping strategy for multi-component systems with dynamic contexts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 233-249.
    20. Maaroufi, Ghofrane & Chelbi, Anis & Rezg, Nidhal, 2013. "Optimal selective renewal policy for systems subject to propagated failures with global effect and failure isolation phenomena," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 61-70.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:32:y:2021:i:7:d:10.1007_s10845-021-01740-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.