IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tax/taxpap/0073.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The concept of tax gaps - Corporate Income Tax Gap Estimation Methodologies

Author

Listed:
  • FISCALIS Tax Gap Project Group

Abstract

The corporate income tax gap (CIT Gap) is the gap between corporate tax revenues as they “should be” collected and as they “are” collected. The gap is an indication of potential CIT revenue losses. This report defines the CIT gap as encompassing both non-deliberate actions by taxpayers (such as errors or omissions) and deliberate actions (such as fraud, evasion and avoidance) that lead to shortfall in revenues. This report reflects the objective of the Tax Gap Project Group (TGPG) to map and share expertise and good practices. The two main approaches to estimating the tax gap – the top-down and bottom-up methods – have both advantages and disadvantages. The choice of the estimation method depends heavily on the availability of data, resources and purposes of the estimate.

Suggested Citation

  • FISCALIS Tax Gap Project Group, 2018. "The concept of tax gaps - Corporate Income Tax Gap Estimation Methodologies," Taxation Papers 73, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission.
    • Handle: RePEc:tax:taxpap:0073
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/sites/taxation/files/taxation_papers_73_en.pdf
    File Function: final version, 2018
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ali-Yrkkö, Jyrki & Koski, Heli & Kässi, Otto & Pajarinen, Mika & Valkonen, Tarmo & Hokkanen, Marja & Hyvönen, Noora & Koivusalo, Elina & Laaksonen, Jarno & Laitinen, Juha & Nyström, Enni, 2020. "The Size of the Digital Economy in Finland and Its Impact on Taxation," ETLA Reports 106, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    2. Ada Jansen & Winile Ngobeni & Alexius Sithole & Wynnona Steyn, 2020. "The corporate income tax gap in South Africa: A top-down approach," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2020-40, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    3. European Commission, 2018. "Tax Policies in the European Union: 2018 Survey," Taxation Survey 2018, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission.
    4. Karolina Konopczak & Aleksander Łożykowski, 2021. "Efekt fiskalny uszczelniania systemu podatkowego w Polsce: próba oszacowania w zakresie podatku CIT," Ekonomista, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, vol. 1, pages 25-55, January.
    5. Aleksandra L. Osmolovskaya-Suslina & Sofiia R. Borisova & Victoria A. Moskvina, 2021. "Integral Tax Collection Index as a New Approach to Assessing Tax Administration," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 6, pages 54-80, December.
    6. -, 2020. "Panorama Fiscal de América Latina y el Caribe, 2020: la política fiscal ante la crisis derivada de la pandemia de la enfermedad por coronavirus (COVID-19)," Libros y Documentos Institucionales, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 45730 edited by Cepal.
    7. Pierfrancesco Alaimo Di Loro & Daria Scacciatelli & Giovanna Tagliaferri, 2023. "2-step Gradient Boosting approach to selectivity bias correction in tax audit: an application to the VAT gap in Italy," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(1), pages 237-270, March.
    8. Nataliia FROLOVA, 2021. "Corporate Income Tax Gap Estimation In The Context Of Development Of Fiscal Space," Economy and Forecasting, Valeriy Heyets, issue 4, pages 125-141.
    9. European Commission, 2019. "Tax Policies in the European Union: 2020 Survey," Taxation Survey 2020, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    corporate taxation; tax gap; european union; tax avoidance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H25 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Business Taxes and Subsidies
    • H26 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Tax Evasion and Avoidance
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tax:taxpap:0073. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gaetan Nicodeme or Ana Xavier or Ioana Diaconescu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dtcecbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.