IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/syd/wpaper/2123-7594.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Some Further Evidence on the Policy Ineffectiveness Proposition

Author

Listed:
  • Bhaskara Rao, B.

Abstract

In the empirical literature of the new classical model and its criticisms, the unemployment equation received much attention. In this paper we shall examine the validity of the new classical policy ineffectiveness proposition, using the output equation. Non-nested hypothesis tests are used to evaluate the Keynesian and new classical output equations. Our results, based on the U.S. data, show that the new classical model and the policy ineffectiveness proposition are conclusively rejected by the Keynesian model for the periods 1946-1985 and 1946-1989.

Suggested Citation

  • Bhaskara Rao, B., 1990. "Some Further Evidence on the Policy Ineffectiveness Proposition," Working Papers 149, University of Sydney, School of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:syd:wpaper:2123/7594
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2123/7594
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Silva Lopes, Artur, 1994. "A "hipótese das expectativas racionais": teoria e realidade (uma visita guiada à literatura até 1992) [The "rational expectations hypothesis": theory and reality (a guided tour ," MPRA Paper 9699, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 23 Jul 2008.
    2. H. Sonmez Atesoglu & Donald Dutkowsky, 1997. "On the dynamics of balance of payments constrained growth," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(10), pages 1343-1351.
    3. Rao, B. Bhaskara, 1993. "The nature of transactions in the U.S. aggregate goods market," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 385-390.
    4. McAleer, Michael, 1995. "The significance of testing empirical non-nested models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 149-171, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:syd:wpaper:2123/7594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vanessa Holcombe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deusyau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.