Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

The social science of economics

Contents:

Author Info

  • Brian Loasby

    (SCEME, University of Stirling)

Abstract

The argument of this paper is that much modern economics is drastically undersocialised because it lacks an understanding of the distinctive characteristics of the evolved human mind, despite the significant insights provided by three of our most famous economists, Adam Smith, Alfred Marshall and Friedrich Hayek. This deficiency results from a failure to apply what may be considered the defining principle of economics, that of analysing the implications of scarcity. These implications challenge the adequacy of a theoretical structure based on the confrontation of preference functions and opportunity sets, even when extended to include formal interdependence, as in game theory; they require both a more modest view of human cognitive abilities and a more extensive view of human motivation and potential.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www.sceme.org.uk/wps/SCEME020_Loasby_2007.pdf
Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 500 Can't connect to www.sceme.org.uk:80 (Bad hostname). If this is indeed the case, please notify (Matthias Klaes)
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by SCEME in its series SCEME Working Papers: Advances in Economic Methodology with number 020/2007.

as in new window
Length: 36 pages
Date of creation: Nov 2007
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:sti:wpaper:020/2007

Contact details of provider:
Email:
Web page: http://www.sceme.org.uk/
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: Adam Smith; Alfred Marshall; Hayek;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sti:wpaper:020/2007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Matthias Klaes) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Matthias Klaes to update the entry or send us the correct address.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.