IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/spo/wpmain/infohdl2441-5286.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Un examen de trois contributions au débat sur les retraites

Author

Listed:
  • Henri Sterdyniak

    (Observatoire français des conjonctures économiques)

Abstract

Après la parution du rapport Charpin en mars 1999, le débat sur l’avenir des retraites en France s’est heureusement intensifié. Je me propose ici de discuter trois contributions importantes parues à la fin de 1999 : l’Avis Teulade adopté au Conseil économique et social; l’ouvrage cosigné par Jean-Chistophe Le Duigou et Jean-Marie Toulisse, qui exprime le point de vue des deux plus importantes organisations syndicales; enfin, le rapport Taddei, qui propose des solutions originales pour la transition entre le travail et la retraite.

Suggested Citation

  • Henri Sterdyniak, 2000. "Un examen de trois contributions au débat sur les retraites," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/5286, Sciences Po.
    • Handle: RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/5286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://spire.sciencespo.fr/hdl:/2441/5286/resources/2000-04-sterdyniak-critique-de-rapports.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henri Sterdyniak & Gaël Dupont & Alexis Dantec, 1999. "Les retraites en France : que faire ?," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 68(1), pages 19-81.
    2. Henri Sterdyniak, 1999. "Pour approfondir le débat, quarante remarques sur le rapport Charpin," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 70(1), pages 237-251.
    3. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5287 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/5286 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/5286 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Henri Sterdyniak, 2000. "Un examen de trois contributions au débat sur les retraites. Critique des rapports : 'L'avenir des systèmes de retraite', 'L'avenir des retraites' et 'Retraites choisies et progressives'," Post-Print hal-01011230, HAL.
    4. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5286 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Henri Sterdyniak, 2000. "Critique de rapports : Un examen de trois contributions au débat sur les retraites," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 73(1), pages 287-307.
    6. Didier Blanchet & Jean-Alain Monfort, 2002. "Croissance, transferts et inégalités entre générations," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 154(3), pages 79-94.
    7. Arnaud Lechevalier, 2000. "L’épargne retraite en France : état des lieux et finalités d’une réforme," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 56(1), pages 217-240.
    8. Ottilia Rouguet & Pierre Villa, 2000. "Le passage des retraites de la répartition à la capitalisation obligatoire : des simulations à l'aide s'une maquette calibrée," Working Papers 2000-02, CEPII research center.
    9. Boyer, Robert, 2000. "The French welfare : an institutional and historical analysis in European perspective," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Couverture Orange) 0007, CEPREMAP.
    10. Alexis Dantec, 2000. "Allonger la durée de cotisation de l'assurance retraite : une solution équitable ?," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 74(1), pages 97-130.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Débat; Retraite;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/5286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Spire @ Sciences Po Library (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecspofr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.