IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/smo/jpaper/015ws.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Relationship between Gender, Year Levels, Assignment Completion and Academic Achievement for College Students

Author

Listed:
  • Wuttiporn Suamuang

    (King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok)

  • Surachai Suksakulchai

    (King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok)

  • Matthew A. Easter

    (University of Missouri, Columbia)

Abstract

In order to effectively enhance students’ learning, doing assignments is an accepted practice of improving content knowledge and self-regulated skills. However, individual differences may impact students’ assignment behaviors. This study examined the relationship between specific assignment variables (i.e. amount of assignment completed, time spent on assignment), gender and grade level. The participants were 786 undergraduate students from five universities in Thailand. A two-way analysis of variance showed that differences of gender and year levels significantly affected the amount of assignments completed and time spent on assignments. The female students completed significantly more assignments and had more time spent on assignment than the male students. For year level differences, freshman complete more amount of assignments than other students (sophomore, junior and senior). On the other hand, junior and senior students spent more time on assignments than sophomores. Using a hierarchical regression analysis, gender and year levels were significantly associated with academic achievement. Moreover, the results revealed that the number of assignments completed was a strongest predictor on academic achievement and had positive associations with academic achievement after controlling gender and year level variables. Our findings then suggest there are differences between gender and undergraduate year levels in terms of assignment completion which may then affect students’ learning outcome.

Suggested Citation

  • Wuttiporn Suamuang & Surachai Suksakulchai & Matthew A. Easter, 2018. "Relationship between Gender, Year Levels, Assignment Completion and Academic Achievement for College Students," Proceedings of the 11th International RAIS Conference, November 19-20, 2018 015WS, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:smo:jpaper:015ws
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rais.education/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/015WS.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Torberg Falch & Marte Rønning, 2011. "Homework assignment and student achievement in OECD countries," Working Paper Series 11411, Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
    2. Jos� Carlos Nú�ez & Natalia Su�rez & Pedro Ros�rio & Guillermo Vallejo & Rebeca Cerezo & Ant�nio Valle, 2015. "Teachers' Feedback on Homework, Homework-Related Behaviors, and Academic Achievement," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 108(3), pages 204-216, April.
    3. Andrew Grodner & Nicholas G. Rupp, 2013. "The Role of Homework in Student Learning Outcomes: Evidence from a Field Experiment," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 93-109, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlos Cortinhas, 2017. "Does formative feedback help or hinder students? An empirical investigation," Discussion Papers 1701, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.
    2. Hadsell, Lester, 2020. "Not for want of trying: Effort and Success of women in principles of microeconomics," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    3. Tin-chun Lin & Subir Bandyopadhyay, 2019. "Are level of preparation and lecture attendance related in the role of influencing students' academic performance?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(3), pages 2040-2051.
    4. Torberg Falch & Marte Rønning, 2011. "Homework assignment and student achievement in OECD countries," Working Paper Series 11411, Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
    5. Heller-Sahlgren, Gabriel, 2018. "Smart but unhappy: Independent-school competition and the wellbeing-efficiency trade-off in education," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 66-81.
    6. Joaquín Artés & Marta Rahona, 2013. "Experimental Evidence on the Effect of Grading Incentives on Student Learning in Spain," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(1), pages 32-46, March.
    7. Pratobevera, Giuseppe, 2022. "Homework and finance students’ learning and achievement," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PB).
    8. Eva María Olmedo-Moreno & Jorge Expósito López & María del Carmen Olmos-Gómez & Micaela Sánchez Martín & Ramón Chacón-Cuberos, 2020. "Academic Self-Efficacy in Unaccompanied Foreign Minors: Structural Equation Modelling According to Schooling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, May.
    9. Tisha L. N. Emerson & Linda K. English & KimMarie McGoldrick, 2018. "The High Costs of Large Enrollment Classes: Can Cooperative Learning Help?," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 44(3), pages 455-474, June.
    10. Constantin Mang, 2016. "Market Consequences of ICT Innovations," ifo Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 70.
    11. Beattie, Graham & Laliberté, Jean-William P. & Michaud-Leclerc, Catherine & Oreopoulos, Philip, 2019. "What sets college thrivers and divers apart? A contrast in study habits, attitudes, and mental health," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 50-53.
    12. Adam M. Lavecchia & Heidi Liu & Philip Oreopoulos, 2014. "Behavioral Economics of Education: Progress and Possibilities," NBER Working Papers 20609, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Jens Schubert, 2023. "The Effect of Gender on Study Effort: Nudges Versus Market Incentives," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 68(1), pages 24-44, March.
    14. Fulya Ersoy, 2021. "Returns to effort: experimental evidence from an online language platform," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(3), pages 1047-1073, September.
    15. Martin S. Andersen & Dora Gicheva & Jeffrey Sarbaum, 2018. "Requiring Versus Recommending Preparation Before Class: Does It Matter?," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 85(2), pages 616-631, October.
    16. Jianzhong Xu & Chuang Wang & Jianxia Du, 2020. "Investigating Factors that Influence Math Homework Expectancy: A Multilevel Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-16, August.
    17. Tatiana Khavenson & Yulia Tyumeneva, 2012. "Teacher Characteristics and Student Achievements in TIMSS. Findings Gained from Applying the "First-Difference" Method to TIMSS-2007 Data," HSE Working papers WP BRP 06/EDU/2012, National Research University Higher School of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Assignment completion; Academic achievement; Individual differences; Thailand; Undergraduate year levels;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:smo:jpaper:015ws. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard David (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://rais.education/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.