IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sce/cplx03/13.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A characterization of self-affine processes in finance through the scaling function

Author

Listed:
  • Marina Resta

    (DIEM sez. Matematica Finanziaria, via Vivaldi 5, 16126, Genova)

  • Davide Sciutti

Abstract

This work focuses on a method to characterize stochastic processes by way of their scaling function tau(·). The kernel idea is that, notwithstanding the properties of the stochastic generating process of raw data, a minimum set of conditions is required to provide empirical estimation of the corresponding scaling function. Additionally, if the generating process belongs to the class of self-affine processes it is possible to express tau in a very simple and elegant way. Starting from the defnition of self-affinity (self-similarity) given By Castaing in the feld of fully developed turbulence, a general closed Form for the scaling function of self-similar processes will be derived, using the relationships between the probability density functions of the increments of self-similar processes at finer and coarser scales through a self-affinity kernel. In particular, the attention will be focused onto two main aspects of Castaing’s formalism: a) Starting from the the Castaing’s formula it is possible to find the scaling function as the Laplace transform of a proper self–affinity kernel; b)conversely, if the functional form of function tau is already known, it is possible to uniquely find the corresponding self-affinity kernel. In order to prove the generality of the results obtained, two examples will be provided (in the mono-fractal and in the multi-fractal case). The latter result is quite interesting, for its practical (econometric) applications, when the behaviour of real data can be replicated by means of self-affine processes. In such case, the generalization provided to the Castaing’s formula makes possible to link through a closed form the (given) probability density function of the increments at some larger time scale together to the (ungiven) probability density function at a smaller scale, with proper parameters,according to the desired scaling function. Obviously this assumption holds if we assume the self-affinity of process under examination. However, this appear to be not too much conditioning. To such purpose, the shape of the scaling function tau of Dow Jones daily returns will be estimated, and hence compared to those derived from time series generated by different stochastic processes (mostly self-affine). first set of conclusions will be hence drawn, since the analysis of the shape of scaling functions suggests a possible criterion to choose the best matching stochastic process to model empirical data.

Suggested Citation

  • Marina Resta & Davide Sciutti, "undated". "A characterization of self-affine processes in finance through the scaling function," Modeling, Computing, and Mastering Complexity 2003 13, Society for Computational Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:sce:cplx03:13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://zai.ini.unizh.ch/www_complexity2003/doc/Paper_Resta.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bacry, E. & Delour, J. & Muzy, J.F., 2001. "Modelling financial time series using multifractal random walks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 84-92.
    2. Laurent Calvet & Adlai Fisher, 2002. "Multifractality In Asset Returns: Theory And Evidence," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 84(3), pages 381-406, August.
    3. Calvet, Laurent & Fisher, Adlai, 2001. "Forecasting multifractal volatility," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 27-58, November.
    4. Francois Schmitt & Daniel Schertzer & Shaun Lovejoy, 2000. "Multifractal Fluctuations In Finance," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(03), pages 361-364.
    5. Ole Barndorff-Nielsen & Neil Shephard, 2000. "Non-Gaussian OU based models and some of their uses in financial economics," OFRC Working Papers Series 2000mf01, Oxford Financial Research Centre.
    6. Coeurjolly, Jean-Francois, 2000. "Simulation and identification of the fractional Brownian motion: a bibliographical and comparative study," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 5(i07).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rossitsa Yalamova, 2012. "Fractal Measures in Market Microstructure Research," Multinational Finance Journal, Multinational Finance Journal, vol. 16(1-2), pages 137-154, March - J.
    2. Lee, Hojin & Chang, Woojin, 2015. "Multifractal regime detecting method for financial time series," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 117-129.
    3. Buonocore, R.J. & Aste, T. & Di Matteo, T., 2016. "Measuring multiscaling in financial time-series," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 38-47.
    4. Xin-Lan Fu & Xing-Lu Gao & Zheng Shan & Zhi-Qiang Jiang & Wei-Xing Zhou, 2018. "Multifractal characteristics and return predictability in the Chinese stock markets," Papers 1806.07604, arXiv.org.
    5. Kukacka, Jiri & Kristoufek, Ladislav, 2021. "Does parameterization affect the complexity of agent-based models?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 324-356.
    6. Lee, Hojin & Song, Jae Wook & Chang, Woojin, 2016. "Multifractal Value at Risk model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 451(C), pages 113-122.
    7. Segnon, Mawuli & Lux, Thomas, 2013. "Multifractal models in finance: Their origin, properties, and applications," Kiel Working Papers 1860, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    8. Krenar Avdulaj & Ladislav Kristoufek, 2020. "On Tail Dependence and Multifractality," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-13, October.
    9. Xiao, Di & Wang, Jun, 2021. "Attitude interaction for financial price behaviours by contact system with small-world network topology," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 572(C).
    10. Selçuk, Faruk & Gençay, Ramazan, 2006. "Intraday dynamics of stock market returns and volatility," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 367(C), pages 375-387.
    11. Calvet, Laurent E. & Fisher, Adlai J., 2008. "Multifrequency jump-diffusions: An equilibrium approach," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 207-226, January.
    12. Chen, Wang & Wei, Yu & Lang, Qiaoqi & Lin, Yu & Liu, Maojuan, 2014. "Financial market volatility and contagion effect: A copula–multifractal volatility approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 398(C), pages 289-300.
    13. Torben G. Andersen & Tim Bollerslev & Francis X. Diebold, 2007. "Roughing It Up: Including Jump Components in the Measurement, Modeling, and Forecasting of Return Volatility," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 89(4), pages 701-720, November.
    14. Zhou, Wei-Xing, 2012. "Finite-size effect and the components of multifractality in financial volatility," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 147-155.
    15. Goddard, John & Onali, Enrico, 2016. "Long memory and multifractality: A joint test," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 451(C), pages 288-294.
    16. Calvet, Laurent E. & Fisher, Adlai J. & Thompson, Samuel B., 2006. "Volatility comovement: a multifrequency approach," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1-2), pages 179-215.
    17. Liu, Ruipeng & Lux, Thomas, 2010. "Flexible and robust modelling of volatility comovements: a comparison of two multifractal models," Kiel Working Papers 1594, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    18. Aldrich, Eric M. & Heckenbach, Indra & Laughlin, Gregory, 2016. "A compound duration model for high-frequency asset returns," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 39(PA), pages 105-128.
    19. Torben G. Andersen & Tim Bollerslev & Francis X. Diebold, 2003. "Some Like it Smooth, and Some Like it Rough: Untangling Continuous and Jump Components in Measuring, Modeling, and Forecasting Asset Return Volatility," PIER Working Paper Archive 03-025, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, revised 01 Sep 2003.
    20. Brandi, Giuseppe & Di Matteo, T., 2022. "Multiscaling and rough volatility: An empirical investigation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Self-affinity; scaling function.;

    JEL classification:

    • C0 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General
    • C15 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Statistical Simulation Methods: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:cplx03:13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sceeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.