This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

The Value of Asset Allocation Advice - Evidence of The Economist’s Quarterly Portfolio Poll

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
J. ANNAERT ()
J.K. DE CEUSTER
W. VAN HYFTE ()
Abstract

This study analyzes the economic importance of portfolio advice. Academic studies mainly focus on the performance of domestic equity portfolios of mutual or pension funds and attempt to measure abnormal performance following a return-based regression approach. Remarkably little is known empirically about the investment performance of international multiple-asset-class portfolios. We construct recommended portfolios based upon the asset allocation and security market advice of major international investment bankers and analyze the performance using weight-based performance techniques. We conclude that advisers are not able to outperform our benchmarks before transaction and other related costs. Weak performance on the asset allocation level is mainly driven by significant underperformance in the equity market. However, as there is significant and persistent differential performance in the short run, especially in the bond market, choosing the right investment adviser is of decisive importance in achieving abnormal performance. Our results indicate that portfolio advisers are not able to realize superior performance through appropriate timing and selection and as a consequence do not add value to a passive strategy of benchmark investing. Moreover, most of them exhibit strong momentum investing suggesting that they shift their recommended portfolio in favor of assets with high past returns and away from assets with low past returns.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.FEB.UGent.be/nl/Ondz/wp/Papers/wp_02_160.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration in its series Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium with number 02/160.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 43 pages
Date of creation: Dec 2002
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:02/160

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Hoveniersberg 4, B-9000 Gent
Phone: ++ 32 (0) 9 264 34 61
Fax: ++ 32 (0) 9 264 35 92
Web page: http://www.feb.ugent.be/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Nathalie Verhaeghe).

Related research
Keywords: Weight-Based Performance Evaluation; Multiple-Asset-Class Portfolios;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Grinblatt, Mark & Titman, Sheridan, 1993. "Performance Measurement without Benchmarks: An Examination of Mutual Fund Returns," Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 66(1), pages 47-68, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Jobson, J D & Korkie, Bob M, 1981. "Performance Hypothesis Testing with the Sharpe and Treynor Measures," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 36(4), pages 889-908, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Cornell, Bradford, 1979. "Asymmetric information and portfolio performance measurement," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 381-390, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Elton, Edwin J & Gruber, Martin J & Blake, Christopher R, 1995. " Fundamental Economic Variables, Expected Returns, and Bond Fund Performance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 50(4), pages 1229-56, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Bruce N. Lehmann & David M. Modest, 1987. "Mutual Fund Performance Evaluation: A Comparison of Benchmarks and Benchmark Comparisons," NBER Working Papers 1721, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  6. Elton, Edwin J. & Gruber, Martin J., 1991. "Differential information and timing ability," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 117-131, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  7. Grinblatt, Mark & Titman, Sheridan & Wermers, Russ, 1995. "Momentum Investment Strategies, Portfolio Performance, and Herding: A Study of Mutual Fund Behavior," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 85(5), pages 1088-1105, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  8. Elton, Edwin J, et al, 1993. "Efficiency with Costly Information: A Reinterpretation of Evidence from Managed Portfolios," Review of Financial Studies, Oxford University Press for Society for Financial Studies, vol. 6(1), pages 1-22. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  9. Lehmann, Bruce N & Modest, David M, 1987. " Mutual Fund Performance Evaluation: A Comparison of Benchmarks and Benchmark Comparisons," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 42(2), pages 233-65, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  10. Admati, Anat R & Ross, Stephen A, 1985. "Measuring Investment Performance in a Rational Expectations Equilibrium Model," Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 58(1), pages 1-26, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  11. Cornell, Bradford & Green, Kevin, 1991. " The Investment Performance of Low-Grade Bond Funds," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 46(1), pages 29-48, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  12. Cumby, Robert E & Glen, Jack D, 1990. " Evaluating the Performance of International Mutual Funds," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 45(2), pages 497-521, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  13. Grinblatt, Mark & Titman, Sheridan, 1994. "A Study of Monthly Mutual Fund Returns and Performance Evaluation Techniques," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(03), pages 419-444, September. [Downloadable!]
  14. Dybvig, Philip H & Ross, Stephen A, 1985. " Differential Information and Performance Measurement Using a Security Market Line," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 40(2), pages 383-99, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  15. Blake, David & Lehmann, Bruce N & Timmermann, Allan, 1999. "Asset Allocation Dynamics and Pension Fund Performance," Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 72(4), pages 429-61, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  16. Mark Grinblatt & Sheridan Titman, . "Portfolio Performance Evaluation: Old Issues and New Insights," Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working Papers 22-88, Wharton School Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research.
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You too can volunteer for RePEc, for example by encouraging others to use our services.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-26.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.