IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/red/sed017/1044.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Endogenous Labor Supply and the Gains from International Trade

Author

Listed:
  • Federico Esposito

    (Tufts University)

  • Costas Arkolakis

    (Yale University)

  • Rodrigo Adao

    (Princeton University)

Abstract

Recent empirical evidence documents that international trade shocks have substantial effects on employment across regional labor markets – see e.g., Autor, Dorn and Hanson (2013), and Dix-Carneiro and Kovak (2016). Despite this evidence, general equilibrium trade models have hitherto overlooked the welfare consequences of endogenous response of labor supply following a trade liberalization. In this paper, we propose a novel framework to investigate the local and aggregate impacts of trade cost shocks on employment and real wages. We consider a standard gravity model featuring endogenous local labor supply and local agglomeration forces. In this environment, we show that the interaction between these two ingredients amplifies the welfare effects of international trade shocks, with the amplification channel magnitude given by the elasticity of local employment to the local domestic trade share. Starting from any initial equilibrium, we establish that the response in local and aggregate employment to international trade shock can be computed with knowledge of this elasticity and usual measures of the trade elasticity and the labor supply elasticity. Intuitively, as in standard gravity models, the domestic trade share is a sufficient statistic for the world demand for labor in a local market, but its effect on welfare is no longer determined solely by the response of bilateral trade flows to bilateral trade cost shocks. Instead, the initial local impact of an international trade shock on the real wage induces a local response in employment that further affects real wages through local agglomeration forces arising, for example, from endogenous firm entry or productivity spillovers. We then propose a novel methodology to estimate the central elasticity in our model using a sample of local labor markets. We construct moment conditions that combine regional data on employment and domestic trade share with changes in regional domestic trade share predicted by our general equilibrium model following observable trade cost shocks in foreign countries. Specifically, we obtain regional shifters of the domestic trade shares using the methodology in Dekle et al. (2008) to compute counterfactual changes in the world trade equilibrium implied by bilateral trade cost shocks. Our methodology has several advantages. First, the model-implied instrument relies on standard forces in gravity models: the region's direct and indirect exposure to trade cost shocks through the world trade network. Second, the moment conditions clearly delineate the main exogeneity assumption required for identification: regional labor supply and productivity shocks are mean-independent from foreign trade cost shocks and the initial trade network. Third, our approach yields a new over-identification test for the validity of the general equilibrium channels in the model that uses moment conditions constructed from shocks in different foreign countries. The intuition behind the empirical strategy is more general than our benchmark framework, and it can be applied in a wide classes of international trade models. Finally, we apply our methodology to evaluate the impact of the recent integration of China to the world equilibrium on employment across US states. To this end, we create a trade matrix including US states and foreign countries between 1997 and 2012. Using actual changes in Chinese trade costs, our preliminary results indicate that, across US states, the changes in the domestic trade share predicted by our general equilibrium model are (i) positively correlated with actual changes in the domestic trade share, and (ii) negatively correlated with total employment, labor force participation, and total population. Our structural estimates are suggest the importance of agglomeration forces in the response of local employment to international trade shocks.

Suggested Citation

  • Federico Esposito & Costas Arkolakis & Rodrigo Adao, 2017. "Endogenous Labor Supply and the Gains from International Trade," 2017 Meeting Papers 1044, Society for Economic Dynamics.
  • Handle: RePEc:red:sed017:1044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://red-files-public.s3.amazonaws.com/meetpapers/2017/paper_1044.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eddy Bekkers & Joseph F. Francois & Hugo Rojas†Romagosa, 2018. "Melting Ice Caps and the Economic Impact of Opening the Northern Sea Route," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 128(610), pages 1095-1127, May.
    2. Antràs, Pol & de Gortari, Alonso & Itskhoki, Oleg, 2017. "Globalization, inequality and welfare," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 387-412.
    3. Céline Carrère & Anja Grujovic & Frédéric Robert-Nicoud, 2020. "Trade and Frictional Unemployment in the Global Economy," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 18(6), pages 2869-2921.
    4. Dudley Cooke, 2016. "Optimal Monetary Policy with Endogenous Export Participation," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 21, pages 72-88, July.
    5. Takanori Ago & Tadashi Morita & Takatoshi Tabuchi & Kazuhiro Yamamoto, 2017. "Endogenous labor supply and international trade," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 13(1), pages 73-94, March.
    6. Shen, Leilei & Silva, Peri, 2018. "Value-added exports and U.S. local labor markets: Does China really matter?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 479-504.
    7. Dai, Mi & Huang, Wei & Zhang, Yifan, 2018. "How Do Households Adjust to Trade Liberalization? Evidence from China's WTO Accession," IZA Discussion Papers 11428, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed017:1044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christian Zimmermann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sedddea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.