China has been widely accused of deliberately maintaining an undervalued currency to fuel its exports. In this paper we argue that one of the most popular measures of equilibrium exchange rates, the Big Mac index, should make way for an Apple index; a theoretically more appealing index where purchasing power parity exchange rates are calculated based on the prices of globally available Apple Inc. products such as the iMac and iPod. Our Apple index also embodies a technique that can account for the value share of non-tradeable inputs, a bias that has plagued the Big Mac index. In contrast to the Big Mac index, the Apple index concludes that the RMB is not undervalued. An alternative explanation for the rapid growth in China’s exports is offered and we note that after accounting for intellectual property right (IPR) piracy, there is nothing in China’s overall trade balance to suggest an undervalued exchange rate. Piracy means that China may well be unfairly benefiting from trade, but the salient policy implication is better IPR enforcement, not distorting the exchange rate in a bid to compensate.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia in its series EAERG Discussion Paper Series with number
0805.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Tobin Millen).
Related research
Keywords:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Did you know? You can import bibliographic info in various formats into you bibliographic tool, or just into your word processor. See under "publisher info" on each abstract page.