Governments typically used expenditures extensively as redistributive devices. Examples include the public provision of health, education, welfare, and public pensions. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the normative rationale for such policies. In particular, we study the role of government expenditures as purely redistributive devices given that the government also has available to it an optimal non-linear income tax. We do so in the context of specific types of quasi-private expenditures meant to represent education and pensions, both of which could have been provided privately. We assume that public provision to an individual cannot be related to individual characteristics or income , so it is uniform across individuals. We derive a set of sufficient conditions for the use of public expenditures in the presence of optimal taxes. The conditions are similar to those which would make subsidies to private provision welfare-improving. Subsidization and public provision appear to be substitute policies. Which one would be preferable depends upon the global characteristics of the economy.
Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Queen's University, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number
796.
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)