IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/78716.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Empirical Theory of Pure Exchange:Individual Demand and Equilibrium

Author

Listed:
  • Dominique, C-Rene

Abstract

SUMMARY: Scientists question the ‘scientificity’ of Neoclassical Economic Theory because microeconomics depends on an un-observable utility function, while the modern version of the theory requires that macroeconomics be built on microfoundations. The first step in remedying such an incongruous analytics is to use ‘naïve’ set theory to show that the utility function is indeed a misleading appendage.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominique, C-Rene, 2017. "An Empirical Theory of Pure Exchange:Individual Demand and Equilibrium," MPRA Paper 78716, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:78716
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/78716/1/MPRA_paper_78694.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dominique, C-Rene, 2008. "Walrasian Solutions Without Utility Functions," MPRA Paper 8906, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2008.
    2. Debreu, Gerard, 1970. "Economies with a Finite Set of Equilibria," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 38(3), pages 387-392, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. C-René DOMINIQUE, 2017. "On The “Scientificity” Of Microeconomics: Individual Demand, And Exchange-Value Determination," Theoretical and Practical Research in the Economic Fields, ASERS Publishing, vol. 8(2), pages 105-110.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dominique, C-Rene, 2016. "Ordinal Space, Utility, and Consumer Demand: A Clarifying Note," MPRA Paper 75030, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. R. M. Harstad & R. Selten, 2014. "Bounded-rationality models:tasks to become intellectually competitive," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 5.
    3. John Geanakoplos, 2008. "Overlapping Generations Models of General Equilibrium," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1663, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    4. Bernard Dumas & Andrew Lyasoff, 2012. "Incomplete-Market Equilibria Solved Recursively on an Event Tree," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 67(5), pages 1897-1941, October.
    5. Bonnisseau, Jean-Marc & Nguenamadji, Orntangar, 2010. "On the uniqueness of local equilibria," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 623-632, September.
    6. Manjira Datta & Kevin Reffett & Łukasz Woźny, 2018. "Comparing recursive equilibrium in economies with dynamic complementarities and indeterminacy," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 66(3), pages 593-626, October.
    7. Chichilnisky, Graciela & Kalman, P.J., 1977. "Properties of critical points and operators in economics," MPRA Paper 7976, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Claudio Mattalia, 2003. "Existence of solutions and asset pricing bubbles in general equilibrium models," ICER Working Papers - Applied Mathematics Series 02-2003, ICER - International Centre for Economic Research.
    9. Charalambos Aliprantis & Kim Border & Owen Burkinshaw, 1996. "Market economies with many commodities," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 19(1), pages 113-185, March.
    10. Riedel, Frank, 2005. "Generic determinacy of equilibria with local substitution," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(4-5), pages 603-616, August.
    11. Behrens, Kristian, 2007. "On the location and lock-in of cities: Geography vs transportation technology," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 22-45, January.
    12. Rui Pascoa, Mario & Ribeiro da Costa Werlang, Sergio, 1999. "Determinacy of equilibria in nonsmooth economies," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 289-302, November.
    13. Magill, Michael & Quinzii, Martine, 2014. "Anchoring expectations of inflation," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 86-105.
    14. Shikhman, V. & Nesterov, Yu. & Ginsburgh, V., 2018. "Power method tâtonnements for Cobb–Douglas economies," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 84-92.
    15. Christian Bidard, 1977. "Equations du commerce international," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 28(2), pages 240-251.
    16. Geanakoplos, J. D. & Polemarchakis, H. M., 1984. "Intertemporally separable, overlapping-generations economies," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 207-215, December.
    17. Hashimzade, Nigar & Majumdar, Mukul, 2002. "Survival under Uncertainty in an Exchange Economy," Working Papers 02-12, Cornell University, Center for Analytic Economics.
    18. Saverio M. Fratini, 2020. "Interest, profit and saving in Arrow-Debreu equilibrium models," Bulletin of Political Economy, Bulletin of Political Economy, vol. 14(1), pages 39-53, June.
    19. Naoki Yoshihara & Se Ho Kwak, 2019. "Sraffian Indeterminacy in General Equilibrium Revisited," UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers 2019-04, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Economics.
    20. Tasos Kalandrakis, 2006. "Regularity of pure strategy equilibrium points in a class of bargaining games," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 28(2), pages 309-329, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    KEYWORDS: Properties of Relations; Order Isomorphisms; Individual Demand; Equilibrium; Attractors’ Reconstruction;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B4 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology
    • D5 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium
    • D50 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:78716. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.