IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/66782.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

National agro-food policies in Jordan

Author

Listed:
  • Soliman, Ibrahim
  • Mashhour, Ahmed

Abstract

Jordan is divided into three main geographic areas with different climate: the Jordan Valley, the Highlands, and the Eastern Desert. The cultivated area is equivalent to 3.4% of the total land, mostly in the Jordan Valley. Although intensive irrigation and modernization processes are available, the local agriculture has to cope with the limited water resources. The contribution of the agricultural sector to the GDP is 3.8% in 2000 and currently it employs 5.7% of the workforce in Jordan. About 80% of local agricultural production consists of fruits, vegetables, and citrus. These constitute 70% of agricultural exports, where agricultural exports (mainly to the Gulf markets) are 10% of Jordan’s total export. The meat production in Jordan is limited, though the production of poultry is more active. The total national poultry production is about 120‐140000 tons per year, and it accounts for a small share in the region’s market. However, imported poultry from Brazil and Thailand contributes progressively in reducing the domestic production. The meat processing industry is active and it has specialized in frozen processed meat products, these products are exported to the neighboring countries. The major vegetables grown locally are tomatoes (representing about 31% of total production), potatoes (about 10%), and cucumber (about 9%). Among the fruit tree products, olives represent the most important production (see the special brief). As shown in figure 2, most importantly Jordan exports, tomatoes, cucumbers, eggplants, and curettes, while it mainly imports grain (wheat and barley). The Jordanian Government has signed a bilateral agreement with Syria, Lebanon, and Turkey, in order to import/export according to their respective needs. This sub‐sector covers the industry, which processes fruits and vegetables, namely tomatoes by companies specialized mainly in producing processing tomatoes and cooked vegetable products. Processed tomato is a large component of Jordan’s agro‐food sector. The industry produces a wide range of products coming from the local tomato crops (peeled tomatoes in cans, tomatoes cubes in cans, tomatoes concentrate, triple concentrate, ketchup, etc.). There are also other companies, which use Jordanian raw materials in the processing of ready cooked meals. There is scope for producing freeze and de‐hydrated dried fruits and vegetables, right now most of the freeze products are imported from Central and Eastern Europe. Dairy products With an output of 165 000 tons of fresh milk, Jordan produces 35 liters per capita while the domestic milk consumption is equivalent to 50 liters per capita. The country imports about 8000 tons of powder milk each year. Dairy products are generally yogurt and cheese (Halloumi type). Milk in bottles or pack is available on the local market but it is highly priced as pasteurized milk. Bakery products this sub‐sector, which includes mills, cereals and breads, is very dynamic and scattered, in fact it accounts for the greatest number of companies in the local food production. Statistics from Jordan Investment Board indicate that the grain milling firms represent 20 – 40% of total investments in the food sector. Cocoa, chocolate, and sugar product this sub‐sector is a traditional one in the Arab world, with all its industries representing the ethnic production (Halawa). The companies export to their traditional Arab and Gulf countries’ market and even to the US, for an amount of 2.184 million JD (15% of domestic production. Microfinance has not served the poorest of the poor, that is, the individuals and households who require a loan the most. The very poor typically are unable to obtain any formal loans, as they do not possess collateral, nor can they join a borrowing group. Even with moderate improvements, interest rates on micro‐finance loans are still excessive, as opposed to commercial banks. Rates are also excessive, compared to the return on investment rates of projects typically found in rural areas, such as trading and husbandry. This is understandable, as no microfinance institution declared that it is in their mission statements to serve the poorest of the poor. Thus, it is imperative that stakeholders find other methods of poverty alleviation, such as grants, subsidies and other services production. Though the role of cooperative societies in development of MSMEs in Jordan remains small, this is not because of limited number of them and volunteer activity in the country. There are over 1,000 cooperative societies are registered, yet only 25% of them, mostly in rural areas, indicate such an aim. For example, the Jordan Hashemite Fund for Human Development (JOHUD) provides services in supporting MSMEs start up and growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Soliman, Ibrahim & Mashhour, Ahmed, 2012. "National agro-food policies in Jordan," MPRA Paper 66782, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 May 2012.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:66782
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/66782/1/MPRA_paper_66782.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goueli, A.A. & Soliman, Ibrahim & Mashhour, Ahmed, 1988. "Economic Comparison Between some Commercial Layer Strains Under Egyptian Condition," Conference Papers 210367, Zagazig University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    2. Weiss, John & Montgomery, Heather & Kurmanalieva, Elvira, 2003. "Micro finance and poverty reduction in Asia: what is the evidence?," MPRA Paper 33140, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. I. Soliman & N. Eid, 1995. "Animal Protein Food Consumption Patterns and Consumer Behavior," Working Papers 9516, Economic Research Forum, revised 08 Mar 1995.
    4. I, Soliman, 1988. "Some economic aspects affecting small ruminants development in near east countries," Conference Papers 209479, Zagazig University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    5. James Copestake, 2002. "Inequality and the polarizing impact of microcredit: evidence from Zambia's copperbelt," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(6), pages 743-755.
    6. Soliman, Ibrahim & Eid, Nafissa, 1995. "Impacts Of Egyptian Socio-Economic Environment On Dietary Pattern And Adequacy," Journal Articles 107278, Zagazig University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Soliman, Ibrahim & Mashhour, Ahmed & Gaber, Mohamed, 2011. "A review of The National and International Agro‐Food Policies and Institutions in Egypt," MPRA Paper 66779, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 May 2011.
    2. Koloma, Yaya, 2019. "Microfinance et réduction de la pauvreté selon le genre au Mali : un réexamen des données de 2007-2008 [Microfinance and Poverty Reduction by Gender in Mali: A Review of 2007-2008 data]," MPRA Paper 94745, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Dan Brockington & Nicola Banks, 2014. "Exploring the Success of BRAC Tanzania’s Microcredit Programme," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 20214, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    4. Sankharaj Roy, 2014. "Role of Microcredit in Economic Empowerment and Social Welfare of Women- An Empirical Study of SHG Members in West-Tripura District," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 5(1(1)), pages 39-46, January.
    5. Sefa Awaworyi Churchill & Ahmed Salim Nuhu, 2016. "What has failed: microfinance or evaluation methods?," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 85-94, April.
    6. Toshio Kondo & Aniceto Orbeta Jr. & Clarence Dingcong & Christine Infantado, 2008. "Impact of Microfinance on Rural Households in the Philippines," Development Economics Working Papers 22639, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    7. Kamel Bel hadj Miled & Jalel-Eddine Ben Rejeb, 2018. "Can Microfinance Help to Reduce Poverty? A Review of Evidence for Developing Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 9(2), pages 613-635, June.
    8. Heiko Fritz & Guenter Lang, 2012. "Microcredit, Human Capital, and Personal Income Distribution: Empirical Evidence from Greater Cairo," Working Papers 30, The German University in Cairo, Faculty of Management Technology.
    9. Sefa K. Awaworyi, 2014. "The Impact of Microfinance Interventions: A Meta-analysis," Monash Economics Working Papers 03-14, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    10. Bappaditya Mukhopadhyay & Sambit Rath, 2011. "Role of MFIs in Financial Inclusion," Review of Market Integration, India Development Foundation, vol. 3(3), pages 243-286, December.
    11. Paul Mosley & June Rock, 2004. "Microfinance, labour markets and poverty in Africa: a study of six institutions," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 467-500.
    12. Kwadwo Afriyie & John Kuumuori Ganle & Alexander Yao Segbefia & Pauline Kamau & Grace Wamue-Ngare, 2020. "Contextual Factors Which Affect the Success of Microcredit Programs Among Women in Ghana," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 36(2), pages 229-254, June.
    13. Mitlin, Diana & Hickey, Sam & Bebbington, Anthony, 2007. "Reclaiming Development? NGOs and the Challenge of Alternatives," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 1699-1720, October.
    14. Stylianou Tasos & Muhammad Ijaz Amjad & Masood Sarwar Awan & Muhammad Waqas, 2020. "Poverty Alleviation and Microfinance for the Economy of Pakistan: A Case Study of Khushhali Bank in Sargodha," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-18, August.
    15. Ibrahim Soliman, 2015. "Diagnosis and Challenges of Sustainable Agricultural Development in Egypt," Cooperative Management, in: Michel Petit & Etienne Montaigne & Fatima El Hadad-Gauthier & José María García Álvarez-Coque & Kons (ed.), Sustainable Agricultural Development, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 19-64, Springer.
    16. Ibrahim Soliman & Jacinto F. Fabiosa & Mohamed Gaber Amer & Siham Kandil, 2010. "Impacts of the Economic Reform Program on the Performance of the Egyptian Agricultural Sector," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 10-wp509, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    17. Flore Gubert & François Roubaud, 2005. "Analyser l’impact d’un projet de Micro-finance : l’exemple d’ADéFI à Madagascar," Working Papers DT/2005/14, DIAL (Développement, Institutions et Mondialisation).
    18. Soliman, Ibrahim & F. Mashhour, Ahmed, 2019. "Feasibility of Artificial Insemination Network for Egyptian Buffalo Development," MPRA Paper 114293, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Ranjula Bali Swain & Supriya Garikipati, 2019. "Microfinance in the Global South: Examining Evidence on Social Efficacy," Working Papers 201908, University of Liverpool, Department of Economics.
    20. van Rooyen, C. & Stewart, R. & de Wet, T., 2012. "The Impact of Microfinance in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review of the Evidence," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(11), pages 2249-2262.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agro‐food policies; Food Consumption; Agricultural labor; Foreign trade; Economics of water resources;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O1 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development
    • Q17 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agriculture in International Trade
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • Q3 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation
    • Q5 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:66782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.