A dynamic limit order market with fast and slow traders
AbstractWe study a dynamic limit order market where agents may invest into a trading technology that grants them a speed advantage over others. Being fast is valuable because it allows limit orders to be revised quickly in the light of new information and therefore reduces the risk of being picked off. Even though this can generate more trading, the equilibrium level of investment is excessive and always generates a welfare loss because fast traders exert negative externalities on slow agents and are able to extract any surplus. If the diffusion of trading technology additionally leads to a more efficient trading process, this result may reverse completely. For sufficiently large efficiency gains, fast traders exert positive externalities on slow market participants and their presence leads to an increase in social welfare, albeit the equilibrium level of investment is below the social optimum. Our results imply that the marginal impact of investments related to algorithmic and high-frequency trading on social welfare crucially depends on the pre-investment level of market efficiency.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 39855.
Date of creation: Jul 2012
Date of revision:
Algorithmic Trading; Limit Order Market; Welfare; Investment;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- D62 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Externalities
- G19 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Other
- C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Alain Chaboud & Benjamin Chiquoine & Erik Hjalmarsson & Clara Vega, 2009. "Rise of the machines: algorithmic trading in the foreign exchange market," International Finance Discussion Papers, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.) 980, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
- FOUCAULT, Thierry & RÖELL, Ailsa & SANDAS, Patrik, 2000.
"Market Making with Costly Monitoring : An Analysis of the SOES Controversy,"
Les Cahiers de Recherche
702, HEC Paris.
- Thierry Foucault & Ailsa Röell & Patrik Sandås, 2003. "Market Making with Costly Monitoring: An Analysis of the SOES Controversy," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 16(2), pages 345-384.
- Johannes A. Skjeltorp & Elvira Sojli & Wing Wah Tham, 2012.
"Sunshine Trading: Flashes of Trading Intent at the NASDAQ,"
Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers
12-141/IV/DSF47, Tinbergen Institute.
- Johannes A. Skjeltorp & Elvira Sojli & Wing Wah Tham, 2011. "Sunshine trading: Flashes of trading intent at the NASDAQ," Working Paper, Norges Bank 2011/17, Norges Bank.
- Jean-Edouard Colliard & Thierry Foucault, 2012.
"Trading Fees and Efficiency in Limit Order Markets,"
Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies,
Society for Financial Studies, vol. 25(11), pages 3389-3421.
- Colliard, Jean-Edouard & Foucault, Thierry, 2011. "Trading Fees and Efficiency in Limit Order Markets," CEPR Discussion Papers, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers 8395, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Foucault, Thierry, 1999. "Order flow composition and trading costs in a dynamic limit order market1," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 99-134, May.
- Terrence Hendershott & Charles M. Jones & Albert J. Menkveld, 2011.
"Does Algorithmic Trading Improve Liquidity?,"
Journal of Finance, American Finance Association,
American Finance Association, vol. 66(1), pages 1-33, 02.
- Liu, Wai-Man, 2009. "Monitoring and limit order submission risks," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 107-141, February.
- Álvaro Cartea & José Penalva, 2011. "Where is the value in high frequency trading?," Banco de Espaï¿½a Working Papers 1111, Banco de Espa�a.
- Goettler, Ronald L. & Parlour, Christine A. & Rajan, Uday, 2009. "Informed traders and limit order markets," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 67-87, July.
- Garvey, Ryan & Wu, Fei, 2010. "Speed, distance, and electronic trading: New evidence on why location matters," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 367-396, November.
- Menkveld, Albert J., 2013. "High frequency trading and the new market makers," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 712-740.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ekkehart Schlicht).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.