IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/10855.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ethics and decision making in publishing journal: Issues to be taken into account

Author

Listed:
  • Safa, Mohammad Samaun

Abstract

One of the most prioritized questions of publishing a new journal in the almost similar fields covered by many other journals warrants certainly some clarification which needs to be addressed in the inaugural issue. A very straight response to this query is promoting business and management science in the country as well as in the region. The unique aim of IJBMR is to focus on quantitative aspects of business and management research. IJBMR has envisioned a future for IJBMR to surrogate the research works that centre around business and management problems of this century with a quantitative view. In this editorial ethical issues in publishing journal articles has been discussed from the perspective of editor, author and reviewer. For decision making in journal publication a new method has been proposed which is known as the SAFA system. the SAFA stands for the "Standardized Acceptance Factor Average". The SAFA of the articles included in this issue are also analyzed.

Suggested Citation

  • Safa, Mohammad Samaun, 2008. "Ethics and decision making in publishing journal: Issues to be taken into account," MPRA Paper 10855, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:10855
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/10855/1/MPRA_paper_10855.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter A. Lawrence, 2003. "The politics of publication," Nature, Nature, vol. 422(6929), pages 259-261, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander Kalgin & Olga Kalgina & Anna Lebedeva, 2019. "Publication Metrics as a Tool for Measuring Research Productivity and Their Relation to Motivation," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 44-86.
    2. Peter A Lawrence, 2009. "Real Lives and White Lies in the Funding of Scientific Research," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-4, September.
    3. Jochen Krauss, 2007. "Journal self-citation rates in ecological sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 73(1), pages 79-89, October.
    4. Lorna Wildgaard & Jesper W. Schneider & Birger Larsen, 2014. "A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicators," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(1), pages 125-158, October.
    5. Anthony F. J. Raan, 2012. "Properties of journal impact in relation to bibliometric research group performance indicators," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(2), pages 457-469, August.
    6. Wilhite, Allen & Fong, Eric A. & Wilhite, Seth, 2019. "The influence of editorial decisions and the academic network on self-citations and journal impact factors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 1513-1522.
    7. Marina Martinčević & Darja Maslić Seršić & Davor Jokić, 2023. "Contribution of CEE authors to psychological science: is the growing trend of publishing in non-CEE journals still present 10 years after its inception?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(6), pages 3703-3721, June.
    8. Beril T. Arik & Engin Arik, 2017. "“Second Language Writing” Publications in Web of Science: A Bibliometric Analysis," Publications, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-12, March.
    9. Hussain, Simon, 2010. "Accounting journals and the ABS quality ratings," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 1-16.
    10. Калгин А. С. & Калгина О. В. & Лебедева А. А., 2019. "Оценка Публикационной Активности Как Способ Измерения Результативности Труда Ученых И Ее Связь С Мотивацией," Вопросы образования // Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 44-86.
    11. Carl Berning & Bernd Weiß, 2016. "Publication bias in the German social sciences: an application of the caliper test to three top-tier German social science journals," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 901-917, March.
    12. Javier Valles-Valenzuela & María D. Pérez-Cárceles & Eduardo Osuna & Aurelio Luna, 2009. "Quantitative analysis of Spanish university scientific output in the area of Legal and Forensic Medicine: International exposure," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 78(3), pages 383-395, March.
    13. Mudassir Hussain & Hashim Ali, 2019. "How to Supervise International PhD Students: A Narrative Inquiry Study," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(5), pages 143-143, October.
    14. Mark D Lindner & Richard K Nakamura, 2015. "Examining the Predictive Validity of NIH Peer Review Scores," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-12, June.
    15. Benda, Wim G.G. & Engels, Tim C.E., 2011. "The predictive validity of peer review: A selective review of the judgmental forecasting qualities of peers, and implications for innovation in science," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 166-182.
    16. Beckmann, Klaus B., 2011. "Das liberale Trilemma," Working Paper 107/2010, Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg.
    17. Sebnem Cansun & Engin Arik, 2018. "Political science publications about Turkey," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(1), pages 169-188, April.
    18. Marco Pautasso, 2010. "Worsening file-drawer problem in the abstracts of natural, medical and social science databases," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(1), pages 193-202, October.
    19. Puetz, Stephen J., 2022. "The infinitely fractal universe paradigm and consupponibility," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    20. Lutz Bornmann, 2011. "Mimicry in science?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(1), pages 173-177, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Standardized Acceptance Factor Average; the SAFA system; IJBMR; ethics; PR-PR dilemma; Texoplagiarism;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Y2 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Introductions and Prefaces

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:10855. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.