IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/pr6q5.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Book Review: “Self-Love, Egoism And The Selfish Hypothesis. Key Debates From Eighteenth-Century British Moral Philosophy” By Christian Maurer

Author

Listed:
  • Walraevens, Benoît
  • Assistant, JHET

Abstract

A review of “Self-Love, Egoism and the Selfish Hypothesis. Key Debates from Eighteenth-Century British Moral Philosophy” by Christian Maurer

Suggested Citation

  • Walraevens, Benoît & Assistant, JHET, 2020. "Book Review: “Self-Love, Egoism And The Selfish Hypothesis. Key Debates From Eighteenth-Century British Moral Philosophy” By Christian Maurer," OSF Preprints pr6q5, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:pr6q5
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/pr6q5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5f68d76b9e9a3d00c86e2da1/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/pr6q5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Force,Pierre, 2003. "Self-Interest before Adam Smith," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521830607.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jimena Hurtado, 2005. "The Utilitarian Foundations Of The Economic Approach To Human Behavior," Documentos CEDE 3633, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    2. Madarász, Aladár, 2014. "A láthatatlan kéz - szemelvények egy metafora történetéből [The invisible hand - extracts from the history of a metaphor]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 801-844.
    3. Avner Offer, 2012. "A Warrant for Pain: Caveat Emptor vs. the Duty of Care in American Medicine, c. 1970-2010," Oxford University Economic and Social History Series _102, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    4. Benoît Walraevens, 2022. "Adam Smith’s Economics and the Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres: The Language of Commerce," Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought, in: Adam Smith’s System, chapter 6, pages 141-166, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. Schliesser, Eric, 2011. "Reading Adam Smith after Darwin: On the evolution of propensities, institutions, and sentiments," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 14-22, January.
    6. Michele Bee & Ivan Sternick, 2022. "No need for society: Adam Smith’s critique of pufendorf’s summa imbecillitas," Textos para Discussão Cedeplar-UFMG 644, Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
    7. Belli, Luca, 2015. "A heterostakeholder cooperation for sustainable internet policymaking," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 4(2), pages 1-21.
    8. Philippe Steiner, 2008. "Foucault, Weber and the history of the economic subject," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 503-527.
    9. Martín Martí N, Victoriano & San Emeterio Martá N, Nieves, 2014. "Baltasar Gracián: El concepto de interés propio como guía de la acción humana/Baltasar Gracián: The Concept of Self- Interest as a Motive for Human Action," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 32, pages 67-82, Enero.
    10. Matthias P. Hühn & Claus Dierksmeier, 2016. "Will the Real A. Smith Please Stand Up!," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 119-132, June.
    11. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/c155l8cuu877r1bk5447sklkp is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Ötsch, Walter, 2020. "Imagination und Bildlichkeit in der Geschichte der Wirtschaftstheorie: Von Adam Smith bis zur frühen Neoklassik," Working Paper Series 63, Cusanus Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung, Institut für Ökonomie.
    13. Marie-Laure Djelic, 2007. "The 'Ethics of Competition' or the Moral Foundations of Contemporary Capitalism," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/c155l8cuu87, Sciences Po.
    14. Ötsch, Walter, 2016. "Imaginative Grundlagen bei Adam Smith: Aspekte von Bildlichkeit und ihrem Verlust in der Geschichte der Ökonomie," Working Paper Series Ök-19, Cusanus Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung, Institut für Ökonomie.
    15. Matson, Erik W., 2021. "The Edifying Discourses of Adam Smith: Focalism, Commerce, and Serving the Common Good," OSF Preprints uye54, Center for Open Science.
    16. Santori, Paolo & Assistant, JHET, 2021. "Idleness and the Very Sparing Hand of God: The invisible tie between Hume’s "Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion" and Smith’s "Wealth of Nations"," OSF Preprints r2uje, Center for Open Science.
    17. Claire Pignol, 2010. "Money, exchange and division of labour in Rousseau's economic philosophy," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 199-228.
    18. Paul Slack, 2009. "Material progress and the challenge of affluence in seventeenth‐century England," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 62(3), pages 576-603, August.
    19. Vicent Llombart Rosa, 2010. "Una aproximación histórica y analítica al pensamiento económico de Jovellanos," Documentos de Trabajo (DT-AEHE) 1012, Asociación Española de Historia Económica.
    20. Klump, Rainer & Pilz, Lars & Assistant, JHET, 2020. "The Formation Of A “Spirit Of Capitalism” In Upper Germany: Leonhard Fronsperger’S (1564) “On The Praise Of Self-Interest”," OSF Preprints 4ztvd, Center for Open Science.
    21. Oswin Krüger Ruiz, 2020. "The Self According to Others: Explaining Social Preferences with Social Approbation," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 9(2), pages 38-54, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:pr6q5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.