A Warrant for Pain: Caveat Emptor vs. the Duty of Care in American Medicine, c. 1970-2010
AbstractBad ethics can make for bad economic outcome.� Bad ethics are defined hedonically as the infliction of pain on others for private advantage.� The infliction of pain is often justified by 'Just World Theories', which state that everyone gets what they deserve.� Market liberalism (and its theoretical underpinning in neoclassical economics) is one theory of this kind.� As an example, the micro and macro underperformance of the American health system c. 1970-2010 is explained in terms of the shift in policy norms from the fiduciary norm "first do no harm" to the neo-liberal market norm of "let the buyer beware" (caveat emptor) since the 1970s.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by University of Oxford, Department of Economics in its series Economics Series Working Papers with number Number 102.
Date of creation: 02 Aug 2012
Date of revision:
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Goodall, Amanda H., 2011.
"Physician-Leaders and Hospital Performance: Is There an Association?,"
IZA Discussion Papers
5830, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
- Goodall, Amanda H., 2011. "Physician-leaders and hospital performance: Is there an association?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(4), pages 535-539, August.
- Avner Offer, 2012. "Self-interest, Sympathy and the Invisible Hand: From Adam Smith to Market Liberalism," Oxford University Economic and Social History Series _101, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
- Avner Offer & Rachel Pechey & Stanley Ulijaszek, 2010.
"Obesity under affluence varies by welfare regimes: the effect of fast food, insecurity, and inequality,"
Oxford University Economic and Social History Series
_082, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
- Offer, Avner & Pechey, Rachel & Ulijaszek, Stanley, 2010. "Obesity under affluence varies by welfare regimes: The effect of fast food, insecurity, and inequality," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 297-308, December.
- Offer, Avner, 2007. "The Challenge of Affluence: Self-Control and Well-Being in the United States and Britain since 1950," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199216628.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Caroline Wise).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.