IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/d8cwz.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Determinants of Intellectual Capital Performance of Banks in Ghana: an Empirical Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Duho, King Carl Tornam
  • Onumah, Joseph Mensah

Abstract

The objective of the study is to examine the variables that determine intellectual capital performance (ICP) of Ghanaian banks. The study applies the Value Added Intellectual Coefficient (VAIC™) model to estimate the ICP of banks, the data envelopment analysis technique to compute the technical efficiency (TE), and cost efficiency (CE) scores while ratio analysis is used to proxy the other variables. The study used an unbalanced panel data of 29 banks over the period 2000-2014 and the panel corrected standard error (PCSE) regression model is used so as to account for heteroscedasticity. Generally, the significant determinants of ICP are research and development investment (R&D), the efficiency of investment in human capital (HCInv), leverage, operational risk, insolvency risk (IR), diversification and return on asset (ROA). R&D, IR and ROA have a significant positive impact on ICP. HCInv and leverage have a significant negative effect on ICP. Diversification significantly enhances ICP but barriers to entry lower ICP. Size and TE negatively affect ICP while CE weakly but positively determines ICP. Bank of Ghana's policy to increase the minimum capital requirement is a good one and will reap the benefit of having a stable, stronger and resilient banking industry which strive for value creation. Banks should consider diversifying their operations so as to increase value. This can easily be done well if R&D is at the core of their operations. Bank managers should factor pricing decisions (strategies) in their attempt to increase value added.

Suggested Citation

  • Duho, King Carl Tornam & Onumah, Joseph Mensah, 2018. "The Determinants of Intellectual Capital Performance of Banks in Ghana: an Empirical Approach," OSF Preprints d8cwz, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:d8cwz
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/d8cwz
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5c8e747c18184e0016c327d9/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/d8cwz?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ghosh, Saibal, 2009. "Financial Deregulation and Profit Efficiency: A Non-parametric Analysis of Indian Banks," MPRA Paper 24292, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Beck, Nathaniel & Katz, Jonathan N., 1995. "What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 89(3), pages 634-647, September.
    3. Guler Aras & Asli Aybars & Ozlem Kutlu, 2011. "The interaction between corporate social responsibility and value added intellectual capital: empirical evidence from Turkey," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(4), pages 622-637, October.
    4. Morck, Randall & Yeung, Bernard, 1991. "Why Investors Value Multinationality," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 64(2), pages 165-187, April.
    5. Fiordelisi, Franco & Marques-Ibanez, David & Molyneux, Phil, 2011. "Efficiency and risk in European banking," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 1315-1326, May.
    6. Boitumelo Dudu Moffat & Abbas Valadkhani, 2011. "Efficiency of Botswana's financial institutions: a data envelopment analysis," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(7), pages 697-702.
    7. Camanho, A.S. & Dyson, R.G., 2008. "A generalisation of the Farrell cost efficiency measure applicable to non-fully competitive settings," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 147-162, February.
    8. Florence Depoers, 2000. "A cost benefit study of voluntary disclosure: some empirical evidence from French listed companies," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 245-263.
    9. James Keenan & Maria Aggestam, 2001. "Corporate Governance and Intellectual Capital: some conceptualisations," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(4), pages 259-275, October.
    10. repec:fth:michin:282 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. K Tone, 2002. "A strange case of the cost and allocative efficiencies in DEA," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 53(11), pages 1225-1231, November.
    12. Jing Li & Richard Pike & Roszaini Haniffa, 2008. "Intellectual capital disclosure and corporate governance structure in UK firms," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 137-159.
    13. Sahoo, Biresh K. & Tone, Kaoru, 2013. "Non-parametric measurement of economies of scale and scope in non-competitive environment with price uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 97-111.
    14. Dimitris Chronopoulos & Claudia Girardone & John Nankervis, 2011. "Are there any cost and profit efficiency gains in financial conglomeration? Evidence from the accession countries," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(8), pages 603-621.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ayouba, Kassoum & Boussemart, Jean-Philippe & Lefer, Henri-Bertrand & Leleu, Hervé & Parvulescu, Raluca, 2019. "A measure of price advantage and its decomposition into output- and input-specific effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(2), pages 688-698.
    2. Sahoo, Biresh K. & Mehdiloozad, Mahmood & Tone, Kaoru, 2014. "Cost, revenue and profit efficiency measurement in DEA: A directional distance function approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(3), pages 921-931.
    3. Yu, Ming-Miin, 2020. "Nerlovian profit inefficiency in non-fully-competitive settings: Definition and decomposition," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    4. Juo, Jia-Ching & Fu, Tsu-Tan & Yu, Ming-Miin & Lin, Yu-Hui, 2015. "Profit-oriented productivity change," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PB), pages 176-187.
    5. Alireza Amirteimoori & Biresh K. Sahoo & Saber Mehdizadeh, 2023. "Data envelopment analysis for scale elasticity measurement in the stochastic case: with an application to Indian banking," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-36, December.
    6. Karagiannis, Giannis, 2023. "Decomposition and aggregation of tone efficiencies," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    7. Zhao, Yu & Morita, Hiroshi & Maruyama, Yukihiro, 2019. "The measurement of productive performance with consideration for allocative efficiency," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 21-39.
    8. Portela, Maria Conceição A. Silva & Thanassoulis, Emmanuel, 2014. "Economic efficiency when prices are not fixed: disentangling quantity and price efficiency," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 36-44.
    9. Marco Allegrini & Giulio Greco, 2013. "Corporate boards, audit committees and voluntary disclosure: evidence from Italian Listed Companies," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(1), pages 187-216, February.
    10. Subramanian Rangan & Metin Sengul, 2009. "Information technology and transnational integration: Theory and evidence on the evolution of the modern multinational enterprise," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 40(9), pages 1496-1514, December.
    11. Giulio Greco, 2011. "Determinants of board and audit committee meeting frequency: Evidence from Italian companies," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 26(3), pages 208-229, March.
    12. Mohsen Afsharian & Anna Kryvko & Peter Reichling, 2011. "Efficiency and Its Impact on the Performance of European Commercial Banks," FEMM Working Papers 110018, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Faculty of Economics and Management.
    13. Hasmanezan Hassan & Najihah Marha Yaacob, 2019. "Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Intellectual Capital Efficiency: Evidence from Malaysia," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 83-95, January.
    14. G. Scott Erickson, 2013. "Role of governance in national innovation systems: from intellectual property to intellectual capital," Chapters, in: Mehmet Ugur (ed.), Governance, Regulation and Innovation, chapter 10, pages 239-261, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Hichem Khlif & Kamran Ahmed & Mohsen Souissi, 2017. "Ownership structure and voluntary disclosure: A synthesis of empirical studies," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 42(3), pages 376-403, August.
    16. Boussemart, Jean-Philippe & Leleu, Hervé & Parvulescu, Raluca, 2022. "Value-based performance and its decomposition into direct price and quantity effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 298-311.
    17. Anna Maria Biscotti & Eugenio D’Amico, 2016. "Theoretical foundation of IC disclosure strategies in high-tech industries," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, February.
    18. Laurens Cherchye & Bram De Rock & Veerle Hennebel, 2017. "Coordination efficiency in multi-output settings: a DEA approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 250(1), pages 205-233, March.
    19. Cherchye, Laurens & De Rock, Bram & Walheer, Barnabé, 2016. "Multi-output profit efficiency and directional distance functions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 100-109.
    20. Mehmet Ugur (ed.), 2013. "Governance, Regulation and Innovation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15264.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:d8cwz. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.