IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/37kd2.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluation of knowledge transfer practices from a Leibniz Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Fascia, Michael

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a growing number of subspecialties within the context of business management, which have begun to talk seriously about a notion of religious points of view in a business context. In this paper we unpack a view from Gottfried Leibniz (1646 – 1716) and to a lesser extent Kant (1724- 1804) and Hegel (1770-1831) in relation to this perspective with a view to interpret the complexity and the role of religion in this arena. Leibniz famously argued that the universe as it currently exists, has to be “the best of all possible worlds,” since an omniscient creator would know all possibilities, and, therefore select the best available options for a starting and ending point. We argue that, although dichotically opposed to the many contemporary empirical attitudes, this perspective still has an inherent and modern-day stance, representative to both business theory and decision making via knowledge transfer mechanisms. Thus, we examine why business start- ups evolve and what effect a religious element has on the central caveat for businesses wishing to achieve success and maintain competitive advantage options, perspectives and scenarios. In this regards, we look at a significant amount of literature, in a bid to understand both the problematic nature surrounding the mechanics used to establish meaningful baselines from the many perspectives. The paper then summarises these theoretical baselines into segmented contexts for discussion

Suggested Citation

  • Fascia, Michael, 2019. "Evaluation of knowledge transfer practices from a Leibniz Perspective," OSF Preprints 37kd2, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:37kd2
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/37kd2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5c69dfa21431270019a05521/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/37kd2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Popescu Manoela & Crenicean Luminiţa Cecilia, 2013. "Considerations Regarding The Size Of Innovative Organization In The Knowledge Economy," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 8(4.1), pages 402-409, december.
    2. Salustiano Martínez-Fierro & José María Biedma-Ferrer & José Ruiz-Navarro, 2016. "Entrepreneurship and strategies for economic development," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 835-851, December.
    3. Rajagopal, 2019. "Contemporary Marketing Strategy," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-11911-9, September.
    4. Manon Enjolras & Mauricio Camargo & Christophe Schmitt, 2016. "SMEs’ Innovation and Export Capabilities: Identification and Characterization of a Common Space Using Data Spatialization," Post-Print hal-02365821, HAL.
    5. Ian Fillis & Ruth Rentschler, 2006. "The Emergence of Creative Marketing," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Creative Marketing, chapter 2, pages 7-25, Palgrave Macmillan.
    6. Marcati, Alberto & Guido, Gianluigi & Peluso, Alessandro M., 2008. "The role of SME entrepreneurs' innovativeness and personality in the adoption of innovations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 1579-1590, October.
    7. Christophe Estay & François Durrieu & Manzoom Akhter, 2013. "Entrepreneurship: From motivation to start-up," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 243-267, September.
    8. Faulkner, Alex & Kent, Julie, 2001. "Innovation and regulation in human implant technologies: developing comparative approaches," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 53(7), pages 895-913, October.
    9. Andrew Copus & Dimitris Skuras & Kyriaki Tsegenidi, 2008. "Innovation and Peripherality: An Empirical Comparative Study of SMEs in Six European Union Member Countries," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 84(1), pages 51-82, January.
    10. S³awomir Czarniewski, 2016. "Small And Medium-Sized Enterprises In The Context Of Innovation And Entrepreneurship In The Economy," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 13(1), pages 30-39, June.
    11. Heidi Wiig Aslesen & Gouya Harirchi, 2015. "The effect of local and global linkages on the innovativeness in ICT SMEs: does location-specific context matter?," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(9-10), pages 644-669, October.
    12. Peter A Zaleski, 2011. "Start-Ups and External Equity: The Role of Entrepreneurial Experience," Business Economics, Palgrave Macmillan;National Association for Business Economics, vol. 46(1), pages 43-50, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fascia, Michael & fascia, sonny, 2019. "Creativity as a Competitive Entrepreneurial Enabler," OSF Preprints wqtvh, Center for Open Science.
    2. Wang, Siqi & Cheah, Jun-Hwa & Lim, Xin-Jean & Leong, Yee Choy & Choo, Wei Chong, 2022. "Thanks COVID-19, I'll reconsider my purchase: Can fear appeal reduce online shopping cart abandonment?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    3. Tahani Z. Aldahdouh & Petri Nokelainen & Vesa Korhonen, 2020. "Technology and Social Media Usage in Higher Education: The Influence of Individual Innovativeness," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440198, January.
    4. Jose‐Maria Garcia‐Alvarez‐Coque & Francisco Mas‐Verdu & Mercedes Sanchez García, 2015. "Determinants of Agri‐food Firms’ Participation in Public Funded Research and Development," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 314-329, June.
    5. Jaroslav Belas & Jan Dvorsky & Ludmila Kozubikova & Martin Cepel, 2019. "Important Factors of SMEs Entrepreneurial Orientation," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 165-179.
    6. Mubariz Mammadli, 2022. "Environmentally Responsible Business Approaches in Azerbaijan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-25, May.
    7. Cowan, Kelly R. & Daim, Tugrul U., 2011. "Review of technology acquisition and adoption research in the energy sector," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 183-199.
    8. Jakob Eder & Michaela Trippl, 2019. "Innovation in the periphery: compensation and exploitation strategies," PEGIS geo-disc-2019_07, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    9. Mieczysław Adamowicz, 2021. "The Potential for Innovative and Smart Rural Development in the Peripheral Regions of Eastern Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-28, February.
    10. Patrick Nunn & Roselyn Kumar, 2019. "Measuring Peripherality as a Proxy for Autonomous Community Coping Capacity: A Case Study from Bua Province, Fiji Islands, for Improving Climate Change Adaptation," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-26, July.
    11. Marta Gancarczyk & Jacek Gancarczyk & Joanna Bohatkiewicz, 2017. "SME Roles in Modular Value Chains: Perspectives for Growth and Innovativeness," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 5(3), pages 95-117.
    12. Zafeirios Thomakis & Irene Daskalopoulou, 2022. "Entrepreneurial Views and Rural Entrepreneurial Potential: Evidence from Greece," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1611-1634, June.
    13. Iovino, Felicetta & Migliaccio, Guido, 2019. "Energy companies and sizes: An opportunity? Some empirical evidences," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 431-439.
    14. Rafik Abdesselam & Jean Bonnet & Patricia Renou-Maissant & Mathilde Aubry, 2018. "Entrepreneurship, economic development, and institutional environment: evidence from OECD countries," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 504-546, December.
    15. Gao, Xue & Rai, Varun, 2023. "Knowledge acquisition and innovation quality: The moderating role of geographical characteristics of technology," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    16. Jocelyn Olivari, 2016. "Entrepreneurial traits and firm innovation," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 6(3), pages 339-360, December.
    17. Mmakgabo Justice Malebana, 2014. "Entrepreneurial Intentions and Entrepreneurial Motivation of South African Rural University Students," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 6(9), pages 709-726.
    18. Shahid, Pirzada Syed Rizwan, 2023. "Founder's Human Capital and the Entrepreneurial Process Duration," OSF Preprints yf6mg, Center for Open Science.
    19. José Ernesto Amorós & Carlos Poblete & Vesna Mandakovic, 2019. "R&D transfer, policy and innovative ambitious entrepreneurship: evidence from Latin American countries," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 1396-1415, October.
    20. Jakob Eder, 2019. "Innovation in the Periphery: A Critical Survey and Research Agenda," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 42(2), pages 119-146, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:37kd2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.