IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/traaab/76-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Deregulation, Trade Reform and Innovation in the South African Agriculture Sector: Trade and Innovation Project - Case Study No. 4

Author

Listed:
  • Ron Sandrey

    (TRALAC (Trade Law Centre for Southern Africa))

  • Nick Vink

    (University of Stellenbosch)

Abstract

This paper is one of five case studies which is a part of a larger project looking at the various effects that trade and investment can have on innovation. This paper studies the effect of deregulation and trade reform on South Africa's agriculture sector. South Africa's agriculture sector is highly dualistic consisting of a developed commercial sector and a subsistence farming sector. Deregulation and trade reform has led to substantial changes in innovation in the commercial agriculture sector such as wine and fruit, leading to a large change in composition while innovation seems to have been more limited in subsistence agriculture which lacks absorption capacity. Legal uncertainties related to land reform may also be one factor which can negatively affect innovation in the commercial farming sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Ron Sandrey & Nick Vink, 2008. "Deregulation, Trade Reform and Innovation in the South African Agriculture Sector: Trade and Innovation Project - Case Study No. 4," OECD Trade Policy Papers 76, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:traaab:76-en
    DOI: 10.1787/240428414841
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/240428414841
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/240428414841?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Letty, Brigid & Shezi, Zanele & Mudhara, Maxwell, 2012. "An exploration of agricultural grassroots innovation in South Africa and implications for innovation indicator development," MERIT Working Papers 2012-023, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    2. Giulia Meloni & Kym Anderson & Koen Deconinck & Johan Swinnen, 2019. "Wine Regulations," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(4), pages 620-649, December.
    3. Cusmano, Lucia & Morrison, Andrea & Rabellotti, Roberta, 2010. "Catching up Trajectories in the Wine Sector: A Comparative Study of Chile, Italy, and South Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(11), pages 1588-1602, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    absorption capacity; agriculture; deregulation; field crops; foreign investment; fruit; innovation; South Africa; trade reform; wine;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:traaab:76-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tdoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.