A Note on Approximating Agreeing to Disagree Results with Common p-Beliefs
AbstractMonderer and samet (1989) generalize Aumann's (1976) agreeing to disagree result for the case of beliefs. They show that if the posteriors of an event are "common p-blief" then they cannot differ by more than 2(1-p). We provide a different proof of this result with a lower bound of 1-p. An example which attains this bound is provided.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science in its series Discussion Papers with number 1029.
Date of creation: Jan 1993
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science, Northwestern University, 580 Jacobs Center, 2001 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208-2014
Web page: http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/research/math/
More information through EDIRC
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Zvika Neeman, 1993.
"Common Beliefs and the Existence of Speculative Trade,"
1052, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
- Neeman, Zvika, 1996. "Common Beliefs and the Existence of Speculative Trade," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 77-96, September.
- Yi-Chun Chen & Alfredo Di Tillio & Eduardo Faingold & Siyang Xiong, 2012.
"The Strategic Impact of Higher-Order Beliefs,"
Levine's Working Paper Archive
786969000000000517, David K. Levine.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Fran Walker).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.