IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpr/mprres/2ea4bb4b7903470984f3296a1aeb3b31.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Did You Get Your Shots? Experimental Evidence on the Role of Reminders

Author

Listed:
  • Matías Busso
  • Julián Cristia
  • Sarah Humpage

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a randomized controlled trial conducted in clinics in rural Guatemala. In randomly selected clinics, community health workers received patient tracking lists that identified children in their coverage area who were due to receive a vaccine that month.

Suggested Citation

  • Matías Busso & Julián Cristia & Sarah Humpage, "undated". "Did You Get Your Shots? Experimental Evidence on the Role of Reminders," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 2ea4bb4b7903470984f3296a1, Mathematica Policy Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:2ea4bb4b7903470984f3296a1aeb3b31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://publications.iadb.org/handle/11319/6944
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jorge M. Agüero, 2019. "Information and Behavioral Responses with More than One Agent: The Case of Domestic Violence Awareness Campaigns," Working papers 2019-04, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    2. Carrera, Mariana & Royer, Heather & Stehr, Mark & Sydnor, Justin & Taubinsky, Dmitry, 2018. "The limits of simple implementation intentions: Evidence from a field experiment on making plans to exercise," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 95-104.
    3. Busso, Matias & Romero, Dario & Salcedo, Dario, 2017. "Improving access to preventive maternal health care using reminders: Experimental evidence from Guatemala," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 43-46.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Vaccination; Guatemala; Reminders; Field Experiment; Health; International;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:2ea4bb4b7903470984f3296a1aeb3b31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joanne Pfleiderer or Cindy George (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mathius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.