Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Should we Bet on Private or Public Water Utilities in Cambodia? Evidence on Incentives and Performace from Seven Provincial Towns

Contents:

Author Info

  • Mike Garn
  • Jonathan Isham

    ()

  • Satu Kahkonen

Abstract

Is public or private sector provision of water more likely to succeed in urban areas of Cambodia? Using quantitative and qualitative data from a range of surveys and technical assessments, this paper compares consumer satisfaction and technical performance of four private and four public utilities in Cambodia. The results indicate that households served by private utilities are significantly more satisfied with the piped water than customers of public utilities: the daily availability and quality of piped water is better and service interruptions are less frequent. This has not happened by accident. Private utilities hire more educated staff whom they pay higher salaries; maintain their facilities on a more regular basis; and implement quality control programs more diligently. Private sector operators seem to face stronger incentives than public utilities to keep their customers satisfied. However, this improved service does not come for free and, consequently, does not yet reach all the available households. Households served by private utilities pay significantly more for piped water services, and some lower-income households that are not served by private utilities are partially limited by the high connection fees (as opposed to the regular monthly payments). Overall, while this recent effort to introduce private sector involvement in the water sector in Cambodia is encouraging, the full gains have not yet been realized. The commercial incentive for improved performace will likely be stronger if the privatization option used is a lease or concession arrangement; if there is more competition in the water market; and if the regulatory structure in Cambodia encourages commercial incentives to be more demand-responsive and cost conscious. Under these conditions, the private sector is a good bet.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www.middlebury.edu/services/econ/repec/mdl/ancoec/0219.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Middlebury College, Department of Economics in its series Middlebury College Working Paper Series with number 0219.

as in new window
Length: 36 pages
Date of creation: Jun 2002
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:mdl:mdlpap:0219

Contact details of provider:

Related research

Keywords: supply; privatization; urban infrastructure; Cambodia;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Emanuel Idelovitch & Klas Ringskog, 1995. "Private Sector Participation in Water Supply and Sanitation in Latin America," Reports _017, World Bank Latin America and the Caribean Region Department.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Basani, Marcello & Isham, Jonathan & Reilly, Barry, 2008. "The Determinants of Water Connection and Water Consumption: Empirical Evidence from a Cambodian Household Survey," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 953-968, May.
  2. Theara Horn, 2011. "Welfare Effects of Access to Water Service in Cambodia," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 11-08, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics and Osaka School of International Public Policy (OSIPP).

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mdl:mdlpap:0219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Vijaya Wunnava).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.