IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/kob/dpaper/dp2016-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Role of Local Accounting Standard Setters in Institutional Complexity: 'Explosion' of Local Standards in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Saori Matsubara

    (Tokai University, Department of Business Administration)

  • Takahiro Endo

    (Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration (RIEB), Kobe University, Japan)

Abstract

Purpose The paper intends to locate the role of local standard setters in institutional complexity, where multiple sources of pressure for change and continuity coexist. The existing research does not fully explore this since it tends to illustrate the way in which a particular interpretation concerning certain accounting standards prevails over time (Archel et al., 2011; Murphy and O'Connell, 2013; Pelger, 2015; Young, 2014). Design/methodology/approach It empirically examines and critiques the Japanese experience through the concepts of institutional complexity and translation that specify the relationship between the name and types of practice of accounting standards in the local context (Czarniawska and Sevón, 1996, 2005; Erlingsdóttir and Lindberg, 2005; Røvik, 2016; Sahlin and Wedlin, 2008). Data sources are texts produced (between 2001-2015) by the local accounting standard setter and relevant organisations that represent firms, the certified public accountants and regulatory agency, respectively. Findings The local accounting standard setter in Japan was exposed to competing pressures between change and maintenance, which was translated by the standard setter in Japan. Consequently, the translation led to an 'explosion' of local accounting standards ('pure' IFRS, Japanese GAAP, modified IFRS and US GAAP). Originality/value This article is the first attempt to systematically examine the role of a local standard setter under institutional complexity. It illustrates how institutional complexity is turned into divergent outcomes against the assumption of previous research that indicates multiple interpretations of particular accounting standards finally merging into a specific one.

Suggested Citation

  • Saori Matsubara & Takahiro Endo, 2016. "The Role of Local Accounting Standard Setters in Institutional Complexity: 'Explosion' of Local Standards in Japan," Discussion Paper Series DP2016-35, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    • Handle: RePEc:kob:dpaper:dp2016-35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieb.kobe-u.ac.jp/academic/ra/dp/English/DP2016-35.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2016
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Irvine, Helen, 2008. "The global institutionalization of financial reporting: The case of the United Arab Emirates," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 125-142.
    2. Botzem, Sebastian & Quack, Sigrid, 2005. "Contested rules and shifting boundaries: International standard setting in accounting," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Internationalization and Organization SP III 2005-201, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    3. W. Miles Fletcher, 2012. "Dreams of economic transformation and the reality of economic crisis in Japan: Keidanren in the era of the ‘bubble’ and the onset of the ‘lost decade,’ from the mid-1980s to the mid-1990s," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 149-165, April.
    4. Matias Laine, 2009. "Ensuring legitimacy through rhetorical changes?," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(7), pages 1029-1054, September.
    5. Walker, Martin, 2010. "Accounting for varieties of capitalism: The case against a single set of global accounting standards," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 137-152.
    6. Georgiou, Omiros & Jack, Lisa, 2011. "In pursuit of legitimacy: A history behind fair value accounting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 311-323.
    7. Guerreiro, Marta Silva & Rodrigues, Lúcia Lima & Craig, Russell, 2012. "Voluntary adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards by large unlisted companies in Portugal – Institutional logics and strategic responses," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 37(7), pages 482-499.
    8. Mostafa Kamal Hassan, 2008. "The development of accounting regulations in Egypt: Legitimating the International Accounting Standards," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 23(5), pages 467-484, May.
    9. Archel, Pablo & Husillos, Javier & Spence, Crawford, 2011. "The institutionalisation of unaccountability: Loading the dice of Corporate Social Responsibility discourse," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 327-343.
    10. Holm, Claus & Zaman, Mahbub, 2012. "Regulating audit quality: Restoring trust and legitimacy," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 51-61.
    11. Claus Holm & Mahbub Zaman, 2012. "Regulating audit quality: Restoring trust and legitimacy," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 51-61, March.
    12. Helen Irvine, 2008. "The global institutionalization of financial reporting: The case of the United Arab Emirates," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(2), pages 125-142, June.
    13. Chua, Wai Fong & Taylor, Stephen L., 2008. "The rise and rise of IFRS: An examination of IFRS diffusion," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 462-473.
    14. Cascino, Stefano & Gassen, Joachim, 2015. "What drives the comparability effect of mandatory IFRS adoption?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 57682, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Murphy, Tim & O’Connell, Vincent & Ó hÓgartaigh, Ciarán, 2013. "Discourses surrounding the evolution of the IASB/FASB Conceptual Framework: What they reveal about the “living law” of accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 72-91.
    16. Begoña Giner & Miguel Arce, 2012. "Lobbying on Accounting Standards: Evidence from IFRS 2 on Share-Based Payments," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 655-691, December.
    17. Erlingsdottír, Gudbjörg & Lindberg, Kajsa, 2005. "Isomorphism, Isopraxism and Isonymism - Complementary or Competing Processes?," Working Paper Series 2005/4, Lund University, Institute of Economic Research.
    18. Lisa Baudot, 2014. "GAAP convergence or convergence Gap: unfolding ten years of accounting change," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(6), pages 956-994, July.
    19. Lisa Baudot, 2014. "GAAP convergence or convergence Gap: unfolding ten years of accounting change," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 27(5), pages 956-994.
    20. Eng, Li Li & Sun, Li & Vichitsarawong, Thanyaluk, 2013. "The valuation properties of earnings and book values reported under IAS, domestic GAAP and U.S. GAAP: Evidence from China, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea and Singapore," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 278-285.
    21. Stefano Cascino & Joachim Gassen, 2012. "Comparability Effects of Mandatory IFRS Adoption," SFB 649 Discussion Papers SFB649DP2012-009, Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mantzari, Elisavet & Georgiou, Omiros, 2019. "Ideological hegemony and consent to IFRS: Insights from practitioners in Greece," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 70-93.
    2. Roberto Aprile & Laura Bini, 2018. "The role of institutions in the process of global convergence to IFRS," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2), pages 111-134.
    3. Bonito, Ana & Pais, Cláudio, 2018. "The macroeconomic determinants of the adoption of IFRS for SMEs," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 116-127.
    4. Aburous, Dina, 2019. "IFRS and institutional work in the accounting domain," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1-15.
    5. Alon, Anna & Dwyer, Peggy D., 2014. "Early Adoption of IFRS as a Strategic Response to Transnational and Local Influences," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 348-370.
    6. Eva Cerioni & Alessia D’Andrea & Marco Giuliani & Stefano Marasca, 2021. "Non-Financial Disclosure and Intra-Industry Comparability: A Macro, Meso and Micro Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, January.
    7. Dominique Dufour & Pierre Teller & Philippe Luu, 2014. "A neo-institutionalist model of the diffusion of IFRS accounting standards," Post-Print hal-00719046, HAL.
    8. Erb, Carsten & Pelger, Christoph, 2015. "“Twisting words”? A study of the construction and reconstruction of reliability in financial reporting standard-setting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 13-40.
    9. Ana Paula Silva & Alexandra Fontes & Carlos Menezes & Tânia Menezes Montenegro, 2023. "Transitioning to an IFRS-Based Accounting System: Longitudinal Insights from Practitioners in Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-21, October.
    10. Guerreiro, Marta Silva & Rodrigues, Lúcia Lima & Craig, Russell, 2012. "Voluntary adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards by large unlisted companies in Portugal – Institutional logics and strategic responses," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 37(7), pages 482-499.
    11. Dominique Dufour & Pierre Teller & Philippe Luu, 2014. "A Neo-institutionalist Model of the Diffusion of IFRS Accounting Standards," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 44(1), pages 27-44, June.
    12. Kettunen, Jaana, 2017. "Interlingual translation of the International Financial Reporting Standards as institutional work," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 38-54.
    13. Krishnan, Sarada R., 2018. "Influence of transnational economic alliances on the IFRS convergence decision in India—Institutional perspectives," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 309-327.
    14. Pierre Teller & Philippe Luu & Dominique Dufour, 2013. "A neo-institutionalist model of the diffusion of IFRS accounting standards," Working Papers hal-00719046, HAL.
    15. De George, Emmanuel T. & Li, Xi & Shivakumar, Lakshmanan, 2016. "A review of the IFRS adoption literature," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 67599, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Albu, Cătălin Nicolae & Albu, Nadia & Alexander, David, 2014. "When global accounting standards meet the local context—Insights from an emerging economy," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 489-510.
    17. Pucci, Richard & Skærbæk, Peter, 2020. "The co-performation of financial economics in accounting standard-setting: A study of the translation of the expected credit loss model in IFRS 9," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    18. Emmanuel T. De George & Xi Li & Lakshmanan Shivakumar, 2016. "A review of the IFRS adoption literature," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 898-1004, September.
    19. Anthony D. Miller & David Oldroyd, 2018. "An Economics Perspective on Financial Reporting Objectives," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(1), pages 104-108, March.
    20. S. Susela Devi & R. Helen Samujh, 2015. "The Political Economy of Convergence: The Case of IFRS for SMEs," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 25(2), pages 124-138, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    IFRS; Local standard setter; Translation; Institutional perspective;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kob:dpaper:dp2016-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Office of Promoting Research Collaboration, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rikobjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.