IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/kch/wpaper/sdes-2017-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Common-Pool Resources are Intrinsically Unstable

Author

Listed:
  • Tatsuyoshi Saijo

    (Research Center for Future Design, Kochi University of Technology)

  • Jun Feng

    (Research Center for Future Design, Kochi University of Technology)

  • Yutaka Kobayashi

    (Research Center for Future Design, Kochi University of Technology)

Abstract

Efficient allocations in common-pool resources cannot be accomplished when appropriators are selfish. In addition, we find that a system of a common-pool resource is locally unstable if there are four or more appropriators. Such instability most likely makes efficiency worse than that in the Nash equilibrium. These results indicate that equilibrium analyses might not capture the essence of the common-pool resource problem. They may also provide an answer to the unexplained pulsing behavior among appropriators and inefficiency observed in experiments.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatsuyoshi Saijo & Jun Feng & Yutaka Kobayashi, 2017. "Common-Pool Resources are Intrinsically Unstable," Working Papers SDES-2017-5, Kochi University of Technology, School of Economics and Management, revised May 2017.
    • Handle: RePEc:kch:wpaper:sdes-2017-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.souken.kochi-tech.ac.jp/seido/wp/SDES-2017-5.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2017
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Koffi Serge William Yao, 2021. "An Experiment on Cooperation in a CPR Game with a Disapproval Option," Post-Print hal-03418905, HAL.
    2. Koffi Serge William Yao, 2021. "An Experiment on Cooperation in a CPR Game with a Disapproval Option," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Koffi Serge William Yao & Emmanuelle Lavaine & Marc Willinger, 2021. "Effectiveness of the approval mechanism for CPR dilemmas: unanimity versus majority rule," CEE-M Working Papers hal-03234786, CEE-M, Universtiy of Montpellier, CNRS, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro.
    4. De Geest, Lawrence R. & Stranlund, John K., 2019. "Defending public goods and common-pool resources," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 143-154.
    5. Tatsuyoshi Saijo, 2020. "Global Stability of Voluntary Contribution Mechanism with Heterogeneous Preferences," Working Papers SDES-2020-6, Kochi University of Technology, School of Economics and Management, revised Jul 2020.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    instability; Nash equilibrium; common-pool resources; pulsing behavior; appropriation problem;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C62 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Existence and Stability Conditions of Equilibrium
    • C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
    • C92 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Group Behavior
    • Q22 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Fishery

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kch:wpaper:sdes-2017-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sachiko Minami (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/smkocjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.