IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iza/izadps/dp9904.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Equal but Inequitable: Who Benefits from Gender-Neutral Tenure Clock Stopping Policies?

Author

Listed:
  • Antecol, Heather

    (Claremont McKenna College)

  • Bedard, Kelly

    (University of California, Santa Barbara)

  • Stearns, Jenna

    (University of California, Davis)

Abstract

Many skilled professional occupations are characterized by an early period of intensive skill accumulation and career establishment. Examples include law firm associates, surgical residents, and untenured faculty at research-intensive universities. High female exit rates are sometimes blamed on the inability of new mothers to survive the sustained negative productivity shock associated with childbearing and early childrearing in these environments. Gender-neutral family policies have been adopted in some professions in an attempt to "level the playing field." The gender-neutral tenure clock stopping policies adopted by the majority of research-intensive universities in the United States in recent decades are an excellent example. But to date, there is no empirical evidence showing that these policies help women. Using a unique data set on the universe of assistant professor hires at top-50 economics departments from 1985-2004, we show that the adoption of gender-neutral tenure clock stopping policies substantially reduced female tenure rates while substantially increasing male tenure rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Antecol, Heather & Bedard, Kelly & Stearns, Jenna, 2016. "Equal but Inequitable: Who Benefits from Gender-Neutral Tenure Clock Stopping Policies?," IZA Discussion Papers 9904, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
  • Handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp9904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://docs.iza.org/dp9904.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    gender-neutral family policies; gender gap in labor market outcomes; childcare and fertility; tenure rates;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp9904. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Holger Hinte (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/izaaade.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.