IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/199301010800001491.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Assessment of the Process Underlying RAW Calculations

Author

Listed:
  • Huffman, Wallace E.

Abstract

The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, Public Law 99-603 (commonly referred to as IRCA), contained provisions having the intent of changing the supply and demand for hired labor on U.S. farms. The legislation defined a new class of farm work called seasonal agricultural services (SAS) which covers most of the farm work in producing and harvesting perishable crops, and a new class of alien workers called SAWs. Because newly legalized special agricultural workers (SAWs) might leave seasonal agricultural services for other U.S. jobs, IRCA contained a provision for replenishing SA Ws. Replenishment with alien workers was permitted if a stated set of conditions was met. In IRCA, the worker shortage calculation was legislated to be a joint venture between the numbers derived by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the U.S. Department of Labor (USDL). The Census Bureau (CB) was to assist in providing some of the needed data. The SAS worker shortage has in fact been negative for each of the calculations. Thus, no RAW worker has been admitted to the United States. The SAS worker shortage calculations come to an end in fiscal 1992, unless new legislation is enacted.The purpose of this paper is to provide a report or assessment of the SAS labor shortage or the number of replenishment agricultural workers (RAWs) needed. The contract indicated that particular attention should be given to ( L) determining whether or not an agricultural labor shortage exists and the adequacy and reliability of the data available to each of the three agencies involved in malting the calculation, (2) an assessment of the data needed to make an accurate determination of a labor shortage for the nation and up to ten regions, and (3) an assessment of the potential for determining from available data the total number of workers in seasonal agricultural services during a year and the number of such workers who are SAWs.

Suggested Citation

  • Huffman, Wallace E., 1993. "An Assessment of the Process Underlying RAW Calculations," ISU General Staff Papers 199301010800001491, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:199301010800001491
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/0fdb671c-882c-47f7-a497-605d99e4ddd3/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. J. Torok & W. E. Huffman, 1986. "U.S.-Mexican Trade in Winter Vegetables and Illegal Immigration," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 68(2), pages 246-260.
    2. Martin, Philip L., 1987. "California's Farm Labor Market," Agricultural Issues Center (AIC) Working Papers 291368, University of California, Davis, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    3. Duffield, James A. & Gunter, Lewell, 1991. "Will Immigration Reform Affect the Economic Competitiveness of Labor-Intensive Crops?," Staff Reports 278542, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huffman, Wallace E., 1996. "Farm Labor: Key Conceptual and Measurement Issues on the Route to Better Farm Cost and Return Estimates," ISU General Staff Papers 199604010800001279, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Goodwin, H. L., 1991. "The U.S.-Mexico Free Trade Agreement: Agricultural Labor Issues," Reports 257951, Texas A&M University, Agribusiness, Food, and Consumer Economics Research Center.
    3. Susan M. Richter & J. Edward Taylor & Antonio Yúnez-Naude, 2007. "Impacts of Policy Reforms on Labor Migration from Rural Mexico to the United States," NBER Chapters, in: Mexican Immigration to the United States, pages 269-288, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Wu, Feng & Guan, Zhengfei & Whitaker, Vance, 2015. "Optimizing yield distribution under biological and economic constraints: Florida strawberries as a model for perishable commodities," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 113-120.
    5. Richter, Susan M. & Taylor, J. Edward, 2005. "Policy Reforms and the Gender Dynamics of Rural Mexico-to-U.S. Migration," Working Papers 190909, University of California, Davis, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    6. Thompson, Gary D., 1989. "Tariff and Nontariff Barrier Impacts on Illegal Migration: Us Fresh Winter Tomato Market," 1989 Occasional Paper Series No. 5 197682, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Wu, Feng & Guan, Zhengfei, 2015. "Modeling the Interactions of Strawberry Commodity and Labor Markets in the US and Mexico," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205887, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Jeffrey Alwang & Judith I. Stallmann, 1994. "The interactions between health benefits and farm wages in Virginia," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(3), pages 229-240.
    9. Figueroa, Enrique E., 1991. "The Impact of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA) on Farm Labor Contracting," Staff Papers 121391, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    10. Wayne H. Howard & Kenneth A. McEwan & George L. Brinkman & Julia M. Christensen, 1991. "Human resource management on the farm: Attracting, keeping, and motivating labor," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 7(1), pages 11-26.
    11. Peyton Ferrier & Chen Zhen, 2014. "The producer welfare effects of trade liberalization when goods are perishable and habit-forming: the case of asparagus," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 45(2), pages 129-141, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:199301010800001491. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.