Poverty measurement with ordinal variables: A generalization of a recent contribution
AbstractBennett and Hatzimasoura (2011) derive a new class of poverty measures suitable for ordinal variables. These indices are weighted sums of the population probabilities of attaining each state of the ordinal variable which is below the poverty line. The weights are uniquely determined by the choice of the classi?single parameter and by the number of ordinal states below the poverty line. However, as I show in this note, such restrictive propery is not necessary for the derivation of poverty measures for ordinal variables that satisfy a broad array of desirable properties, including those advocated by Bennett and Hatzimasoura. The class of measures proposed in this note include those of the authors, as a specific subclass. Since the class of admissible poverty measures for ordinal variables is unbounded, the note provides two dominance conditions whose fulfillment ensure the agreement of ordinal poverty comparisons among measures belonging to subfamilies within the class.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality in its series Working Papers with number 246.
Length: 10 pages
Date of creation: Feb 2012
Date of revision:
Poverty measurement; ordinal variables; stochastic dominance.;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- I32 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2012-10-27 (All new papers)
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Chrysanthi Hatzimasoura & Christopher J. Bennett, 2011. "Poverty Measurement with Ordinal Data," Working Papers 2011-14, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
- Allison, R. Andrew & Foster, James E., 2004. "Measuring health inequality using qualitative data," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 505-524, May.
- Gaston Yalonetzky, 2013. "Stochastic Dominance with Ordinal Variables: Conditions and a Test," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 126-163, January.
- Buhong Zheng, 2011. "A new approach to measure socioeconomic inequality in health," Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 555-577, December.
- Foster, James & Greer, Joel & Thorbecke, Erik, 1984. "A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 761-66, May.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Maria Ana Lugo).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.