IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ilo/ilowps/992032993402676.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Technological choice, employment generation, income distribution and consumer demand: the case of furniture making in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • House, William J.

Abstract

This study is part of a major research project on technology, products and income distribution. Approximately ten country case studies should serve the central objective of the project, that is to determine the extent to which an improvement in income distribution is likely to be consistent with the consumption of goods and services produced using labour-intensive technologies thereby generating employment. In the case of furniture making in Kenya, the author estimates the direct employment effect in the furniture industry as a result of a policy of income distribution through growth. He finds that a realistic reduction in income inequality will lead to the creation of 17.000 to 24.000 jobs in furniture production. Policy issues concerning credit and the provision of infrastructure are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • House, William J., 1980. "Technological choice, employment generation, income distribution and consumer demand: the case of furniture making in Kenya," ILO Working Papers 992032993402676, International Labour Organization.
    • Handle: RePEc:ilo:ilowps:992032993402676
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/1980/80B09_428_engl.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frances Stewart, 1978. "Technology and Underdevelopment," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, edition 0, number 978-1-349-15932-1, December.
    2. James, Jeffrey,, 1977. "Technology, products and income distribution; a conceptualisation and application to sugar processing in India," ILO Working Papers 991743093402676, International Labour Organization.
    3. James, Jeffrey, 1976. "Products, processes and incomes: Cotton clothing in India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 143-149, February.
    4. Ballentine, J Gregory & Soligo, Ronald, 1978. "Consumption and Earnings Patterns and Income Distribution," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(4), pages 693-708, July.
    5. Bourguignon, François., 1978. "General equilibrium analysis of the colombian income distribution; applications to rural development, wage and income policies," ILO Working Papers 991778573402676, International Labour Organization.
    6. Richards, P. J., 1979. "Some distributional issues in planning for basic needs health care," ILO Working Papers 991844993402676, International Labour Organization.
    7. Sen, Amartya,, 1978. "Three notes on the concept of poverty," ILO Working Papers 991757103402676, International Labour Organization.
    8. Tokman, Victor E., 1974. "Distribution of income, technology and employment: An analysis of the industrial sectors of Ecuador, Peru and Venezuela," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 2(10-12), pages 49-57.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haiwen Zhou, 2013. "The Choice of Technology and Rural-Urban Migration in Economic Development," Frontiers of Economics in China-Selected Publications from Chinese Universities, Higher Education Press, vol. 8(3), pages 337-361, September.
    2. Daron Acemoglu & Fabrizio Zilibotti, 2001. "Productivity Differences," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 116(2), pages 563-606.
    3. Christine Greenhalgh, 2013. "Science, Technology, Innovation and IP in India: New Directions and Prospects," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2013n37, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    4. Jerzmanowski, Michal & Tamura, Robert, 2019. "Directed technological change & cross-country income differences: A quantitative analysis," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    5. Thomas Aronsson & Sugata Ghosh & Ronald Wendner, 2023. "Positional preferences and efficiency in a dynamic economy," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 61(2), pages 311-337, August.
    6. Barreiros, Lídia., 1985. "Operationalizing concepts and measurement of poverty and basic needs," ILO Working Papers 992431043402676, International Labour Organization.
    7. Sanghamitra Chakravarty & Georgina Mercedes Gómez, 2024. "A Development Lens to Frugal Innovation: Bringing Back Production and Technological Capabilities into the Discourse," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 36(1), pages 82-101, February.
    8. Shamsavari, Ali & Taha, Yasser & Adikibi, Owen, 2002. "Technology and technology transfer: some basic issues," Economics Discussion Papers 2002-5, School of Economics, Kingston University London.
    9. Jayne, T. S. & Takavarasha, T. & van Zyl, Johan, 1994. "Interactions Between Food Market Reform And Regional Trade In Zimbabwe And South Africa: Implications For Food Security," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 33(4), December.
    10. Gustav Ranis & Frances Stewart, 2000. "Strategies for Success in Human Development," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 49-69.
    11. Mancini, Lorenzo & Paz, María José, 2018. "Oil sector and technological development: Effects of the mandatory research and development (R&D) investment clause on oil companies in Brazil," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 131-143.
    12. Nikhil Sinha, 1994. "Les technologies de l'information et la perspective du chômage technologique dans les pays en développement," Revue Tiers Monde, Programme National Persée, vol. 35(138), pages 411-424.
    13. Tuna Dinç, 2012. "The Two Sector Model of Learning-By Doing and Productivity Differences," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 59(5), pages 583-598, December.
    14. Daron Acemoglu, 2002. "Directed Technical Change," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 69(4), pages 781-809.
    15. Jianghua Zhou & Hao Jiao & Jizhen Li, 2017. "Providing Appropriate Technology for Emerging Markets: Case Study on China’s Solar Thermal Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-21, January.
    16. Puerto, Sergio, 2023. "Agriculture, innovation, and development: What happens when new technology is not good enough?," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 335821, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Scuotto, Veronica & Beatrice, Orlando & Valentina, Cillo & Nicotra, Melita & Di Gioia, Leonardo & Farina Briamonte, Massimiliano, 2020. "Uncovering the micro-foundations of knowledge sharing in open innovation partnerships: An intention-based perspective of technology transfer," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    18. Khwaja, Asim Ijaz, 2001. "Can Good Projects Succeed in Bad Communities? Collective Action in the Himalayas," Working Paper Series rwp01-043, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    19. Daron Acemoglu, 2003. "Patterns of Skill Premia," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 70(2), pages 199-230.
    20. Mehmet AKYOL, 2016. "Effectiveness of State Aid for Investments In The Process of Economic Growth: Turkish Case," Turkish Economic Review, KSP Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 391-400, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ilo:ilowps:992032993402676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vesa Sivunen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ilounch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.