This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Guide to Design and Development of Health-State Utility Instrumentation

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
William Furlong (Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University)
David Feeny (Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Department of Economics, Centre for Health Economics & Policy Analysis, McMaster University)
George Torrance (Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Department of Business, Centre for Health Economics & Policy Analysis, McMaster University)
Ronald Barr (Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University)
John Horsman (Department of Medicine, McMaster University)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Growing interest in methods of quantifying health-related quality of life has resulted in demand for a manual describing general techniques that may be customized by health researchers and used to measure preferences in applications having a wide variety of objectives. This report is intended to provide practice guidelines to researchers who require information about the design, construction and administration of instruments used to obtain estimates of health utility. The focus is on the steps required to conduct a study in which preferences are measured; the theory that underlies utility measurement is not presented. Utility scores may be used to assess the health-related quality of life for specific health states. Utility scores are also useful in evaluations, such as cost-utility analyses, in which the costs of health care interventions are compared to their consequences both in terms of quantity and quality of life. In order to obtain reliable, valid, and responsive utility scores, however, the instruments must be carefully designed, tested and executed. Experience to date indicates that careful instrument development requires time, effort and care. Three major instruments are described: rating scale, standard gamble and time trade-off. Methodologically correct techniques are recommended where possible and suggestions, based on experience, are presented for situation in which theoretical or empirical evidence is lacking. The guide discusses the criteria for selection of techniques, materials, interviewers and respondents. Examples of an interviewer training manual, interview scripts and data recording forms are also included. Detailed diagrams provide specifications for assembling visual aids (i.e., interviewing props) and an extensive bibliography will direct readers interested in specific issues to appropriate references.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.chepa.org/Portals/0/pdf/wp90-9.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: First version, 1990
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada in its series Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series with number 1990-09.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 148 pages
Date of creation: 1992
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:hpa:wpaper:199009

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Faculty of Health Sciences, Mc Master University, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3Z5
Phone: (905) 525-9140, extension 22122
Fax: (905) 546-5211
Email:
Web page: http://www.chepa.org/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Gioia Buckley).

Related research
Keywords:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You can use convenient plug-ins to search directly IDEAS from your browser.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-15.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.