IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hig/wpaper/04psy2012.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A validation study of a Russian version of the Schwartz Value Survey (SVS) using cognitive interviewing

Author

Listed:
  • Tatiana Panyusheva

    (Higher School of Economics (Moscow, Russia). International Laboratory of Socio-Cultural Research)

  • Maria Efremova

    (Higher School of Economics (Moscow, Russia). International Laboratory of Socio-Cultural Research)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to validate a Russian version of the Schwartz Value Survey using cognitive interviewing. This paper aims to explore the issue of whether respondents interpret the values proposed in the survey in the way intended by the author. An analysis of the results reveals problems with understanding the wording, which are due both to subtle differences in translation and the cultural context. The findings of the qualitative analysis allow for a better understanding of the quantitative data. A number of recommendations are given to the researchers applying this Russian-language SVS

Suggested Citation

  • Tatiana Panyusheva & Maria Efremova, 2012. "A validation study of a Russian version of the Schwartz Value Survey (SVS) using cognitive interviewing," HSE Working papers WP BRP 04/PSY/2012, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:04psy2012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hse.ru/data/2012/12/06/1301884021/04PSY2012.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rossalina Latcheva, 2011. "Cognitive interviewing and factor-analytic techniques: a mixed method approach to validity of survey items measuring national identity," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 1175-1199, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jayachandran, Seema & Biradavolu, Monica & Cooper, Jan, 2021. "Using Machine Learning and Qualitative Interviews to Design a Five-Question Women's Agency Index," IZA Discussion Papers 14221, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Marlene Mußotter, 2022. "We do not measure what we aim to measure: Testing Three Measurement Models for Nationalism and Patriotism," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2177-2197, August.
    3. Jayachandran, Seema & Biradavolu, Monica & Cooper, Jan, 2023. "Using machine learning and qualitative interviews to design a five-question survey module for women’s agency," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    4. Michael Braun & Dorothée Behr & Juan Díez Medrano, 2018. "What do respondents mean when they report to be “citizens of the world”? Using probing questions to elucidate international differences in cosmopolitanism," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 1121-1135, May.
    5. Shang Ha & Seung-Jin Jang, 2015. "National Identity, National Pride, and Happiness: The Case of South Korea," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 121(2), pages 471-482, April.
    6. André Krouwel & Annemarie Elfrinkhof, 2014. "Combining strengths of methods of party positioning to counter their weaknesses: the development of a new methodology to calibrate parties on issues and ideological dimensions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1455-1472, May.
    7. Bastiaan Bruinsma & Marlene Mußotter, 2023. "A Move Forward: Exploring National Identity Through Non-linear Principal Component Analysis in Germany," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 885-903, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    values; SVS; cognitive interviewing.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Z - Other Special Topics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:04psy2012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Shamil Abdulaev or Shamil Abdulaev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.