Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Amateur or professional? A new look at 19th century. patentees in Norway

Contents:

Author Info

  • Basberg, Bjørn L.

    ()
    (Dept. of Economics, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    The paper analyses Norwegian 19th century patentees. A special focus is on the affiliation or relationship of the patentees to the manufacturing industries, business and the wider economy. A main question is whether the inventors were what might be called ‘amateurs’ working independently, or ‘professionals’ working closer to firms or institutions. A main finding is that even the individual patentees, that comprised the majority of all patentees, had strong associations with industry, and the distinction between ‘professionals’ and ‘amateurs’ is not all that useful.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.nhh.no/Admin/Public/DWSDownload.aspx?File=%2fFiles%2fFiler%2finstitutter%2fsam%2fDiscussion+papers%2f2012%2f12.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Department of Economics, Norwegian School of Economics in its series Discussion Paper Series in Economics with number 12/2012.

    as in new window
    Length: 18 pages
    Date of creation: 26 Apr 2012
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:hhs:nhheco:2012_012

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: NHH, Department of Economics, Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen, Norway
    Phone: +47 55 959 277
    Fax: 5595 9100
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.nhh.no/sam/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: Industrial breakthrough; Norway; patentees; patents; professional inventors.;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:nhheco:2012_012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dagny Hanne Kristiansen).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.