Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Measuring Key Disparities in Human Development: The Gender Inequality Index

Contents:

Author Info

  • Amie Gaye

    ()
    (Human Development Report Office, UNDP)

  • Jeni Klugman

    ()
    (Human Development Report Office, UNDP)

  • Milorad Kovacevic

    ()
    (Human Development Report Office, UNDP)

  • Sarah Twigg

    ()
    (Human Development Report Office, UNDP)

  • Eduardo Zambrano

    ()
    (Department of Economics at the Orfalea College of Business, Cal Poly)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Gender inequality remains a major barrier to human development. Girls and women have made major strides since 1990, but they have not yet gained gender equity. In this paper, we review ways to measure and monitor gender inequality, providing a critique of existing measures including the first global gender indices that were launched in the 1995 Human Development Report – the Gender-related Development Index and the Gender Empowerment Measure - and introduce a new index that is presented in the 2010 Human Development Report. The Gender Inequality Index, which addresses the key criticisms of previous measures, is unique in including critical issues of educational attainment, economic and political participation, and reproductive health issues and in accounting for overlapping inequalities at the national level. As such, it represents an important advance on existing global measures of gender equity. Measures of the disadvantages for women raise awareness of problems, permit monitoring of progress towards gender equity objectives and help keep governments accountable. In this light, the Gender Inequality Index is designed to reveal the extent to which the realization of a country’s human development potential is curtailed by gender inequality, and provides empirical foundations for policy analysis and advocacy efforts. We also compare our results with the results of alternative gender inequality indices, finding significant variation in rankings across the various indices due largely to differences in the elements of gender inequality they seek to measure.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2010/papers/HDRP_2010_46.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Human Development Report Office (HDRO), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in its series Human Development Research Papers (2009 to present) with number HDRP-2010-46.

    as in new window
    Length: 41 pages
    Date of creation: Dec 2010
    Date of revision:
    Publication status: Published as background research for the 2010 Human Development Report.
    Handle: RePEc:hdr:papers:hdrp-2010-46

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: 304 E 45th Street, FF-12th Floor, New York, NY, 10017
    Phone: +1-212-906-3661
    Fax: +1-212-906-5161
    Email:
    Web page: http://hdr.undp.org
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: Human Development; Gender inequality; gender index; human development; measurement;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hdr:papers:hdrp-2010-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (HDRO/UNDP).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.