This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Can the state replace private capital investors? Public financing of venture capital in Hungary

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Judit Karsai () (Institute of Economics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

It is generally accepted that venture capital exerts a positive influence on economic development, and Hungarian economic policy, too, regards it as a means to accelerate economic growth, enhance the export capacity of companies, improve employment, increase tax revenues, investments and research and development expenditures, that is, to boost the overall competitiveness of the country. Although Hungary boasts an advanced venture capital industry in regional comparison, the capital supply of small/startup companies especially is still unresolved. The successive Hungarian governments having come to power since the change of the economic and political regime declared almost without exception the importance of venture capital, and made efforts to contribute to raising its supply. These efforts, however, have been rather ineffective due to their almost exclusive reliance on direct state intervention and disregard for the much more successful western solutions stimulating private sector venture capital investors. The present paper first describes the reasons, areas, direct and indirect forms of state intervention in the venture capital industry. Subsequently, it surveys its specific reasons and practice so far on the Hungarian venture capital market. It highlights the essential difference in approach reflected by the Hungarian and the western experiences, respectively, and makes a proposal as to how the state could promote the development of the venture capital market more effectively and in a more market-oriented way, with special regard to Hungary’s prospective accession to the European Union in 2004. Accordingly, the state should avoid direct capital investment in companies, bypassing the private sector; it should supplement the funds of private investors as co-financier, and control co-operation with them by reducing the risks and increasing the profits associated with investments enjoying state preference for private investors. This would allow the state to realise its economy and venture capital industry development objectives simultaneously.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.econ.core.hu/doc/dp/dp/mtdp0409.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences in its series IEHAS Discussion Papers with number 0409.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 24 pages
Date of creation: Jun 2004
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:has:discpr:0409

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 1112 Budapest, Budaorsi ut 45.
Phone: (36-1) 319-3119
Fax: (36-1) 319-3136
Web page: http://econ.core.hu
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Zsuzsa Balabán).

Related research
Keywords: venture capital; public policy;

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

  1. Josh Lerner, 1996. "The Government as Venture Capitalist: The Long-Run Effects of the SBIR Program," NBER Working Papers 5753, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Gordon C. Murray, 1998. "A Policy Response to Regional Disparities in the Supply of Risk Capital to New Technology-based Firms in the European Union: The European Seed Capital Fund Scheme," Regional Studies, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 32(5), pages 405-419, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Murray, Gordon C. & Marriott, Richard, 1998. "Why has the investment performance of technology-specialist, European venture capital funds been so poor?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(9), pages 947-976, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Manigart, Sophie & De Waele, Koen & Wright, Mike & Robbie, Ken & Desbrieres, Philippe & Sapienza, Harry J. & Beekman, Amy, 2002. "Determinants of required return in venture capital investments: a five-country study," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 291-312, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  5. Josh Lerner, 2002. "When Bureaucrats Meet Entrepreneurs: The Design of Effective "Public Venture Capital" Programmes," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 112(477), pages F73-F84, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? No RePEc service, like IDEAS, charges for the use or the display of bibliographic data.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-25.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.