IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-03787681.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Übergänge In Der Globalen Polarität Und Die Strategie Der Vereinigten Staaten Von Amerika Gegenüber Südasien
[Transitions In Global Polarity And The United States Of America’S Strategy Toward South Asia]

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Ijaz Malik

    (Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad)

  • Muhammad Nadeem Mirza

    (School of Politics and International Relations, Quaid-i Azam University)

  • Irfan Hasnain Qaisrani

    (Bahria University)

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This study intends to explore the discourses on patterns of systemic polarity. The study of these discourses helps in the development of the discipline of International Relations. The study also explores the foreign policy of the United States - being the greatest power of the time and claiming to be the custodian of the prevailing international order – towards South Asia. Methodology: This is a qualitative explanatory and exploratory study. The specific method utilized to conduct the study remains the discourse analysis. Main Findings: The study finds that international polarity is a continuous process of transition. These are a combination of systemic and sub-systemic actors and factors that contribute to this transition. Applications of this study: The study is useful for students and scholars of International Relations, Area Studies, Strategic Studies, and allied disciplines. It is equally useful for policy practitioners. Novelty/Originality of this study: The discourses on patterns of international polarity have contributed to the development of International Relations as a discipline. A significant debate on the discourses of international polarity has been the pattern of post-Cold War and Post-9/11 orders. While there has been a relatively dominant claim that this era overall shows evidence of unipolarity; there is an equally influential claim that the international order appears multipolar. There is however a need to address a primary question that demands an inquiry into the type of multipolarity in the post-Cold War and post-9/11 eras as it is assumed that the dynamics of international order and great power rivalries in this era are significantly different from the earlier patterns of international multipolarity. This inquiry is informed by focusing on the policies of great powers toward south Asia and the transforming geostrategic and economic relations between significant South Asian states.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Ijaz Malik & Muhammad Nadeem Mirza & Irfan Hasnain Qaisrani, 2020. "Übergänge In Der Globalen Polarität Und Die Strategie Der Vereinigten Staaten Von Amerika Gegenüber Südasien [Transitions In Global Polarity And The United States Of America’S Strategy Toward South," Post-Print halshs-03787681, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03787681
    DOI: 10.18510/hssr.2020.84145
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03787681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03787681/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18510/hssr.2020.84145?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wagner, R. Harrison, 1993. "What was bipolarity?," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(1), pages 77-106, January.
    2. Hopf, Ted, 1991. "Polarity, the Offense-Defense Balance, and War," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 85(2), pages 475-493, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charles W. Kegley Jr. & Gregory A. Raymond, 1992. "Must We Fear a Post-Cold War Multipolar System?," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 36(3), pages 573-585, September.
    2. R. Harrison Wagner, 2004. "Bargaining, War, and Alliances," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 21(3), pages 215-231, July.
    3. Stephen Biddle & Stephen Long, 2004. "Democracy and Military Effectiveness," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 48(4), pages 525-546, August.
    4. Lachowicz, Mirosław & Leszczyński, Henryk & Topolski, Krzysztof A., 2019. "Self-organization with small range interactions: Equilibria and creation of bipolarity," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 343(C), pages 156-166.
    5. David L. Rousseau, 2002. "Motivations for Choice," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 46(3), pages 394-426, June.
    6. Lisa L. Martin, 1994. "4. Heterogeneity, Linkage and Commons Problems," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 6(4), pages 473-493, October.
    7. Jonathan N Markowitz & Christopher J Fariss, 2018. "Power, proximity, and democracy," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 55(1), pages 78-93, January.
    8. Duncan Snidal, 1994. "3. The Politics of Scope: Endogenous Actors, Heterogeneity and Institutions," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 6(4), pages 449-472, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03787681. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.