IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03126046.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

When nomadic technologies simultaneously influence well-being and stress at work
[Quand les technologies nomades influencent simultanément le bien-être et le stress au travail]

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre Loup

    (MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School - UM - Université de Montpellier, UM - Université de Montpellier)

  • Jonathan Maurice

    (TSM - Toulouse School of Management Research - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - UT - Université de Toulouse - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - TSM - Toulouse School of Management - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - UT - Université de Toulouse)

  • Florence Rodhain

    (MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School - UM - Université de Montpellier, UM - Université de Montpellier)

Abstract

The aim of this article is to analyze the role of mobile technologies (MT) on employees' well-being and technostress. Two research questions are considered: (1) To what extent do employees perceive these technologies as additional job demands and/or resources in their daily work? (2) How does the combination of demands and resources given by MT influence well-being, stress and performance at work? To answer these questions, a qualitative study was conducted within La Poste group that introduced MT for its commercial departments. The results show that this kind of devices is perceived as resources by individuals and improve their well-being at work. At the same time, and independently, they generate techno-overload and techno-invasion in private life, increasing the level of stress to which the individual may be exposed. From a theoretical perspective, this study documents the disconnection between well-being at work and technostress. Both concepts can be fostered independently and simultaneously by the introduction of MT, namely through addictive behaviors. Based on our results, we develop a job demands-resources model (JD-R) adapted to such an introduction and formulate a set of research propositions.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre Loup & Jonathan Maurice & Florence Rodhain, 2020. "When nomadic technologies simultaneously influence well-being and stress at work [Quand les technologies nomades influencent simultanément le bien-être et le stress au travail]," Post-Print hal-03126046, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03126046
    DOI: 10.3917/sim.203.0009
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03126046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03126046/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3917/sim.203.0009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nathalie Greenan & Sylvie Hamon-Cholet & Frédéric Moatty & Jérémie Rosanvallon, 2012. "TIC et conditions de travail. Les enseignements de l'enquête COI," Post-Print hal-00710223, HAL.
    2. T. S. Ragu-Nathan & Monideepa Tarafdar & Bhanu S. Ragu-Nathan & Qiang Tu, 2008. "The Consequences of Technostress for End Users in Organizations: Conceptual Development and Empirical Validation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 417-433, December.
    3. Pierre-Yves Gomez & Romain Chevallet, 2011. "Impacts des technologies de l'information sur la santé au travail," Post-Print hal-02312600, HAL.
    4. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    5. repec:dau:papers:123456789/13590 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Michel Kalika & Nabila Boukef Charki & Henri Isaac, 2007. "La théorie du millefeuille et l'usage des TIC dans l'entreprise," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(3), pages 117-129.
    7. Charles-Henri Besseyre des Horts & Henri Isaac, 2006. "L'impact des TIC mobiles sur les activités des professionnels en entreprise," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(9), pages 243-263.
    8. Véronique Dagenais-Desmarais & André Savoie, 2012. "What is Psychological Well-Being, Really? A Grassroots Approach from the Organizational Sciences," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 659-684, August.
    9. Géraldine de La Rupelle & Anne-Marie Fray & Michel Kalika, 2014. "Messagerie électronique, facteur de stress dans le cadre de la relation managériale," Post-Print hal-01664072, HAL.
    10. Michel Kalika & Henri Isaac, 2008. "Surcharge informationnelle, urgence et TIC," Post-Print halshs-00668823, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pierre Loup & Jonathan Maurice & Florence Rodhain & Sophia Belghiti Mahut, 2016. "Influences des technologies nomades sur le bien-être et le stress au travail : une approche par les ressources et contraintes," Post-Print hal-02124653, HAL.
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/7962 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Min Feng & Driss Bourazzouq, 2021. "Effects of Technostress in the Role Stress Context on Proximity Managers' Performance," Post-Print hal-03233176, HAL.
    4. Chiara Panari & Giorgio Lorenzi & Marco Giovanni Mariani, 2021. "The Predictive Factors of New Technology Adoption, Workers’ Well-Being and Absenteeism: The Case of a Public Maritime Company in Venice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Peng, Zeyu & Sun, Yongqiang & Guo, Xitong, 2018. "Antecedents of employees’ extended use of enterprise systems: An integrative view of person, environment, and technology," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 104-120.
    6. Min Feng & Driss Bourazzouq, 2021. "Effects of Technostress in the Role Stress Context on Proximity Managers’ Performance," Post-Print hal-03233171, HAL.
    7. Christian Arnold & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2019. "Determinants of Industrial Internet of Things Adoption in German Manufacturing Companies," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1-21, October.
    8. Philippe Cohard, 2020. "Information Systems Values: A Study of the Intranet in Three French Higher Education Institutions," Post-Print hal-02987225, HAL.
    9. Awni Rawashdeh, 2013. "Study Toward The Understanding Of Behavioral Intention To Use A Customer Relationship Management (Crm) Systems," Far East Journal of Psychology and Business, Far East Research Centre, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, September.
    10. Melih Engin & Fatih Gürses, 2019. "Adoption of Hospital Information Systems in Public Hospitals in Turkey: An Analysis with the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Model," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1-19, October.
    11. Hasan, Rajibul & Lowe, Ben & Petrovici, Dan, 2020. "Consumer adoption of pro-poor service innovations in subsistence marketplaces," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 461-475.
    12. Morosan, Cristian, 2016. "An empirical examination of U.S. travelers’ intentions to use biometric e-gates in airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 120-128.
    13. Tsung Teng Chen, 2012. "The development and empirical study of a literature review aiding system," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(1), pages 105-116, July.
    14. Lawrence Bunnell & Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson & Victoria Y. Yoon, 0. "RecSys Issues Ontology: A Knowledge Classification of Issues for Recommender Systems Researchers," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-42.
    15. Issa Mohamed Al Dafaei & Zurida Ismail & Mohd Ali Samsudin & Firas Jalal Shakir, 2013. "The Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy towards the Relationship Between Attitudes And Level of Use Towards Instructional Computer Technology in Oman," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(12), pages 2382-2398, December.
    16. Abdesamad Zouine & Pierre Fenies, 2014. "The Critical Success Factors Of The ERP System Project: A Meta-Analysis Methodology," Post-Print hal-01419785, HAL.
    17. Debora Bettiga & Lucio Lamberti & Emanuele Lettieri, 2020. "Individuals’ adoption of smart technologies for preventive health care: a structural equation modeling approach," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 203-214, June.
    18. Mbassi, Christophe Martial & Messono, Omang Ombolo, 2023. "Historical technology and current economic development: Reassessing the nature of the relationship," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    19. René Riedl & Harald Kindermann & Andreas Auinger & Andrija Javor, 2012. "Technostress from a Neurobiological Perspective," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 4(2), pages 61-69, April.
    20. Luke Butcher & Ian Phau & Min Teah, 2016. "Brand prominence in luxury consumption: Will emotional value adjudicate our longing for status?," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(6), pages 701-715, November.
    21. Ahmed Ibrahim Alzahrani & T. Ramayah & Nalini Suppiah & Osama Alfarraj & Nasser Alalwan, 2020. "Modeling Blog Usage From a Developing Country Perspective Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03126046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.