IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02865587.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Hegemony in asymmetric customer-supplier relationships

Author

Listed:
  • Rhona Elizabeth Johnsen

    (Audencia Business School)

  • Sylvie Lacoste

    (Pôle Customer, Retail and Supply Chain - Rouen Business School - Rouen Business School)

  • Joanne Meehan

Abstract

This paper explores the concept of hegemony to understand how power relates to hegemony and the potential influence of hegemony on business relationships. The nature of hegemony, its connections to the power literature and its impacts on customer-supplier relationships can expose the mechanisms that contribute to sustaining inequality in asymmetric relationships. We bridge the concept of hegemony (with roots predominantly from the international relations and sociology fields) to the relationship and interaction literature showing the derivations, distinctions and potential evolutions of literature combining power and hegemony in customer-supplier relationships. A conceptual framework, 'the hegemonic triangle', identifies a hegemonic approach to customer-supplier relationships involving dominance, mastery and authority. Hegemonic relationships may evolve from imbalanced power of a customer over a supplier through determinedly and unilaterally imposing these three facets to exert influence over a supplier. The hegemonic triangle is situated at three boundary levels of influence; the contract, the market, and ideology. Hegemony is positioned at the meta level and represents a spatial domain impacting mental models of actors who legitimize practices and ideas. The paper presents an agenda for research linking hegemony and power to guide future conceptual and empirical developments in B2B relationship and interaction studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Rhona Elizabeth Johnsen & Sylvie Lacoste & Joanne Meehan, 2020. "Hegemony in asymmetric customer-supplier relationships," Post-Print hal-02865587, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02865587
    DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.01.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gligor, David M. & Pillai, Kishore Gopalakrishna & Golgeci, Ismail, 2021. "Theorizing the dark side of business-to-business relationships in the era of AI, big data, and blockchain," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 79-88.
    2. Wang, Liwen & Jin, Jason Lu & Zhou, Kevin Zheng, 2023. "Technological capability strength/asymmetry and supply chain process innovation: The contingent roles of institutional environments," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(4).
    3. Mitręga, Maciej & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "How small-and-medium transportation companies handle asymmetric customer relationships under COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-method study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    4. Paul F. Skilton & Ednilson Bernardes, 2022. "Normal misconduct in the prescription opioid supply chain," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(4), pages 6-29, October.
    5. Liwen Wang & Jin Jason Lu & Kevin Zhou, 2023. "Technological Capability Strength/Asymmetry and Supply Chain Process Innovation: The Contingent Roles of Institutional Environments in China," Post-Print hal-03954124, HAL.
    6. Talay, Cagri & Oxborrow, Lynn & Goworek, Helen, 2022. "The impact of asymmetric supply chain relationships on sustainable product development in the fashion and textiles industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 326-335.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02865587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.