IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01899167.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pourquoi les entreprises françaises adoptent-elles le Balanced Scorecard ? Une étude empirique

Author

Listed:
  • Youssef Erami
  • Nourreddine Guehair

    (UPPA - Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour)

Abstract

The factors explaining the adoption of the Balanced Scorecard method (BSC) have been the object of little academic research in France. This article is based on a quantitative approach. It aims to explore the factors that increase the likelihood of a firm adopting this method. This paper is based on approaches pertaining to contingency and innovation diffusion theories and processes questionnaire data from a sample of 81 French companies. The results of multiple logistic regressions show the notable positive influence of manager's culture of innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Youssef Erami & Nourreddine Guehair, 2014. "Pourquoi les entreprises françaises adoptent-elles le Balanced Scorecard ? Une étude empirique," Post-Print hal-01899167, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01899167
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01899167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01899167/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Youssef Errami, 2013. "Le Balanced Scorecard : entre modélisation de la création de valeur et déploiement stratégique," Post-Print hal-02431184, HAL.
    2. Gordon, Lawrence A. & Narayanan, V. K., 1984. "Management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and organization structure: An empirical investigation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 33-47, January.
    3. Maurice Gosselin & Tania Dubé, 2002. "Influence De La Strategie Sur L'Adoption Des Mesures De Performance En Vigueur Dans Le Systeme De Comptabilite De Gestion," Post-Print halshs-00584469, HAL.
    4. Danny Miller & Peter H. Friesen, 1982. "Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(1), pages 1-25, January.
    5. Mooraj, Stella & Oyon, Daniel & Hostettler, Didier, 1999. "The balanced scorecard: a necessary good or an unnecessary evil?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 481-491, October.
    6. Denis Choffel & François Meyssonnier, 2005. "Dix ans de débats autour du Balanced Scorecard," Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 11(2), pages 61-81.
    7. Merchant, Kenneth A., 1984. "Influences on departmental budgeting: an empirical examination of a contingency model," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 9(3-4), pages 291-307, October.
    8. Robert S. Kaplan, 2010. "Conceptual Foundations of the Balanced Scorecard," Harvard Business School Working Papers 10-074, Harvard Business School.
    9. Langfield-Smith, Kim, 1997. "Management control systems and strategy: A critical review," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 207-232, February.
    10. Gosselin, Maurice, 1997. "The effect of strategy and organizational structure on the adoption and implementation of activity-based costing," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 105-122, February.
    11. Denis Choffel & François Meyssonnier, 2005. "Dix Ans De Debats Autour Du Balanced Scorecard," Post-Print halshs-00581157, HAL.
    12. Chenhall, R. H. & Langfield-Smith, K., 1998. "The relationship between strategic priorities, management techniques and management accounting: an empirical investigation using a systems approach," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 243-264, April.
    13. Thierry Nobre, 2001. "Le contrôleur de gestion de la PME," Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 7(1), pages 129-146.
    14. Chenhall, Robert H., 2003. "Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 127-168.
    15. Christophe Germain, 2003. "Le " Unbalanced Scorecard " Ou L'Analyse De La Differenciation Des Systemes De Mesure De La Performance," Post-Print halshs-00582778, HAL.
    16. Dent, Jeremy F., 1990. "Strategy, organization and control: Some possibilities for accounting research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 15(1-2), pages 3-25.
    17. Simons, Robert, 1987. "Accounting control systems and business strategy: An empirical analysis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 357-374, June.
    18. Annick Bourguignon & Véronique Malleret & Hanne Nørreklit, 2002. "L'irréductible dimension culturelle des instruments de gestion : l'exemple du tableau de bord et du balanced scorecard," ACCRA, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 8(3), pages 7-32.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chenhall, Robert H., 2003. "Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 127-168.
    2. Ellen Haustein & Robert Luther & Peter Schuster, 2014. "Management control systems in innovation companies: a literature based framework," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 343-382, February.
    3. Chapman, Christopher S., 1997. "Reflections on a contingent view of accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 189-205, February.
    4. Samuel Sponem, 2010. "Diversité des pratiques de contrôle budgétaire:approches contingentes et néo-institutionnelles," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 13(3), pages 115-153., September.
    5. Henri, Jean-Francois, 2006. "Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 529-558, August.
    6. Bedford, David S. & Malmi, Teemu & Sandelin, Mikko, 2016. "Management control effectiveness and strategy: An empirical analysis of packages and systems," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 12-28.
    7. Cinquini, Lino & Tenucci, Andrea, 2007. "Is the adoption of Strategic Management Accounting techniques really “strategy-driven”? Evidence from a survey," MPRA Paper 11819, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Cooper, Christine, 2015. "Entrepreneurs of the self: The development of management control since 1976," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 14-24.
    9. Cadez, Simon & Guilding, Chris, 2008. "An exploratory investigation of an integrated contingency model of strategic management accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 836-863.
    10. Verbeeten, F.H.M., 2005. "New’ Performance Measures: Determinants of Their Use and Their Impact on Performance," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2005-054-F&A, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    11. Annukka Jokipii, 2010. "Determinants and consequences of internal control in firms: a contingency theory based analysis," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 14(2), pages 115-144, May.
    12. Adler, Ralph W., 2011. "Performance management and organizational strategy: How to design systems that meet the needs of confrontation strategy firms," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 251-263.
    13. Macinati, Manuela S. & Anessi-Pessina, E., 2014. "Management accounting use and financial performance in public health-care organisations: Evidence from the Italian National Health Service," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 98-111.
    14. Ittner, Christopher D. & Larcker, David F., 2001. "Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-3), pages 349-410, December.
    15. Iryna Alves & Sofia M. Lourenço, 2022. "The use of non-financial performance measures for managerial compensation: evidence from SMEs," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 151-187, June.
    16. Denis Choffel & François Meyssonnier, 2005. "Dix Ans De Debats Autour Du Balanced Scorecard," Post-Print halshs-00581157, HAL.
    17. Adel Elgharbawy & Magdy Abdel-Kader, 2013. "Enterprise governance and value-based management: a theoretical contingency framework," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(1), pages 99-129, February.
    18. Pizzini, Mina J., 2006. "The relation between cost-system design, managers' evaluations of the relevance and usefulness of cost data, and financial performance: an empirical study of US hospitals," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 179-210, February.
    19. P. Maik Hamann, 2017. "Towards a contingency theory of corporate planning: a systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 67(4), pages 227-289, August.
    20. Lee, Chia-Ling & Wang, Wen-Ying, 2020. "Strategy, accountants’ activities and new product development performance," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01899167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.