IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01465788.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Consumer–Brand Relationships: A Contrast of Nostalgic and Non-Nostalgic Brands

Author

Listed:
  • Aurélie Kessous

    (INSEEC - Institut des hautes études économiques et commerciales | School of Business and Economics)

  • Elyette Roux

    (CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon, AMU IAE - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Aix-en-Provence - AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

  • Jean-Louis Chandon

    (INSEEC - Institut des hautes études économiques et commerciales | School of Business and Economics)

Abstract

This research examined how consumer–brand relationships change when one contrasts brands perceived as nostalgic with brands perceived as non-nostalgic. Paired comparisons of brands in six product categories revealed that brand attachment, self-brand connections, and storytelling, as well as, the propensity to offer the brand as a gift and collect brand-derived products, depend on the nostalgic status of the brand. On a sample of 606 consumers, the results showed that a brand's nostalgic status has a positive effect on attachment, self-brand connections, and storytelling. These effects had not previously been considered in nostalgia research. Furthermore, the nostalgic status of a brand has positive effects in terms of intention to purchase the brand as a gift and collect brand-derived products. Moreover, ANOVA results illustrate that consumer relationships with nostalgic brands are systematically stronger than with non-nostalgic brands. Finally, results indicated that product category moderates all of the dimensions of brand relationships while gender does not. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • Aurélie Kessous & Elyette Roux & Jean-Louis Chandon, 2015. "Consumer–Brand Relationships: A Contrast of Nostalgic and Non-Nostalgic Brands," Post-Print hal-01465788, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01465788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmad Daryanto & Nicholas Alexander & Gilang Kartika, 2022. "The anthropomorphic brand logo and its effect on perceived functional performance," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(3), pages 287-300, May.
    2. Japutra, Arnold & Ekinci, Yuksel & Simkin, Lyndon, 2019. "Self-congruence, brand attachment and compulsive buying," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 456-463.
    3. Martin Heinberg & Constantine S. Katsikeas & H. Erkan Ozkaya & Markus Taube, 2020. "How nostalgic brand positioning shapes brand equity: differences between emerging and developed markets," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 869-890, September.
    4. Magdalena Grebosz-Krawczyk, 2020. "How Nostalgia Affects Brand Equity? Consumers’ Attitudes Towards Nostalgic Generational and Transgenerational Brands," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 1019-1034.
    5. Ford, John B. & Merchant, Altaf & Bartier, Anne-Laure & Friedman, Mike, 2018. "The cross-cultural scale development process: The case of brand-evoked nostalgia in Belgium and the United States," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 19-29.
    6. Naeem Gul Gilal & Jing Zhang & Faheem Gul Gilal & Rukhsana Gul Gilal, 2020. "Bygone days and memories: the effects of nostalgic ads on consumer brand resurrection movements," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(2), pages 160-180, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01465788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.