IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01422789.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

EDI, a tool for organizational transformation: a case study in the automotive industry
[L'EDI, instrument de transformation organisationnelle : Une étude de cas dans le secteur automobile]

Author

Listed:
  • Maher Agi
  • Eric Ballot

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Depuis son apparition vers la fin des années 70, l'EDI s'est développé progressivement pour occuper une place importante parmi les moyens d'échange d'information interentreprises. De nombreuses études ont montré l'apport de cette technologie notamment en termes de raccourcissement des temps de cycle, de réduction des erreurs et de faibles coûts de transmission des informations. Cependant, peu de recherches terrain ont traité de sa contribution dans la transformation de l'organisation industrielle et logistique des partenaires commerciaux qui la mettent en place, objet de notre présente étude. Dans celle-ci, nous analysons le cas d'un constructeur automobile exigeant la connectivité par EDI avec l'ensemble de ses fournisseurs. Au-delà de ses retombées positives en termes d'allègement des coûts administratifs, notre étude met en évidence la contribution de cette technologie de l'information et de communication dans la réalisation de transformations stratégiques de l'organisation industrielle et logistique du constructeur. En effet, l'utilisation de l'EDI avec ses fournisseurs est perçue par le constructeur comme une condition de sa transition vers une stratégie de production et de distribution à la commande et en flux tendus. Plus précisément, notre analyse montre que l'EDI est censé jouer le rôle d'une grammaire technique permettant de faire face à la complexité croissante des processus industriels et logistiques entre le constructeur et ses fournisseurs. Il devrait favoriser aussi le contrôle des flux par le constructeur d'une manière centralisée et en temps réel, et faciliter pour lui le transfert de certaines tâches logistiques à ses fournisseurs.

Suggested Citation

  • Maher Agi & Eric Ballot, 2005. "EDI, a tool for organizational transformation: a case study in the automotive industry [L'EDI, instrument de transformation organisationnelle : Une étude de cas dans le secteur automobile]," Post-Print hal-01422789, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01422789
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01422789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01422789/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Hart & Carol Saunders, 1997. "Power and Trust: Critical Factors in the Adoption and Use of Electronic Data Interchange," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(1), pages 23-42, February.
    2. Nicholas S. Argyres, 1999. "The Impact of Information Technology on Coordination: Evidence from the B-2 “Stealth” Bomber," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 162-180, April.
    3. Nathalie Fabbe-Costes, 2000. "Le rôle transformatif des SIC et TIC sur les interfaces multi-acteurs de la distribution et de la logistique," Post-Print hal-03313097, HAL.
    4. M. Bensaou & N. Venkatraman, 1995. "Configurations of Interorganizational Relationships: A Comparison Between U.S. and Japanese Automakers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(9), pages 1471-1492, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nagy, A., 2009. "Adoption of interorganizational information systems : The adoption position model," Other publications TiSEM af471297-bf03-43bf-88c1-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Indranil R. Bardhan & Vish V. Krishnan & Shu Lin, 2007. "Project Performance and the Enabling Role of Information Technology: An Exploratory Study on the Role of Alignment," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 579-595, May.
    3. Basole, Rahul C. & Nowak, Maciek, 2018. "Assimilation of tracking technology in the supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 350-370.
    4. Jacques Crémer & Luis Garicano & Andrea Prat, 2007. "Language and the Theory of the Firm," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 122(1), pages 373-407.
    5. Crémer, Jacques & Garicano, Luis & Prat, Andrea, 2003. "Codes in Organizations," IDEI Working Papers 172, Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse, revised Feb 2005.
    6. Deepa Mani & Anitesh Barua & Andrew B. Whinston, 2012. "An Empirical Analysis of the Contractual and Information Structures of Business Process Outsourcing Relationships," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(3-part-1), pages 618-634, September.
    7. Anna Cabigiosu & Arnaldo Camuffo, 2012. "Beyond the “Mirroring” Hypothesis: Product Modularity and Interorganizational Relations in the Air Conditioning Industry," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 686-703, June.
    8. Véronneau, Simon & Roy, Jacques, 2009. "RFID benefits, costs, and possibilities: The economical analysis of RFID deployment in a cruise corporation global service supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 692-702, December.
    9. M. Max Evans & Ilja Frissen & Anthony K. P. Wensley, 2018. "Organisational Information and Knowledge Sharing: Uncovering Mediating Effects of Perceived Trustworthiness Using the PROCESS Approach," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-29, March.
    10. Venugopal Gopalakrishna-Remani & Robert Paul Jones & Kerri M. Camp, 2019. "Levels of EMR Adoption in U.S. Hospitals: An Empirical Examination of Absorptive Capacity, Institutional Pressures, Top Management Beliefs, and Participation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 1325-1344, December.
    11. Rambabu Lavuri & Abhinav Jindal & Umair Akram & Bhukya Koteswara Rao Naik & Alrence Santiago Halibas, 2023. "Exploring the antecedents of sustainable consumers' purchase intentions: Evidence from emerging countries," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 280-291, February.
    12. Moriuchi, Emi & Takahashi, Ikuo, 2022. "The role of perceived value, trust and engagement in the C2C online secondary marketplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 76-88.
    13. Knoppen, Desirée & Sáenz, María Jesús, 2017. "Interorganizational teams in low-versus high-dependence contexts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 15-25.
    14. Bianco, Federica & Michelino, Francesca, 2010. "The role of content management systems in publishing firms," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 117-124.
    15. Subramanian Rangan & Metin Sengul, 2009. "Information technology and transnational integration: Theory and evidence on the evolution of the modern multinational enterprise," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 40(9), pages 1496-1514, December.
    16. Juan Manuel de la Fuente-Sabaté & Julio Rodríguez-Puerta & José David Vicente-Lorente & José Angel Zúñiga-Vicente, 2007. "Do stable strategic time periods exist? Towards new methodological and theoretical insights," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 171-180.
    17. Sang M. Lee & Seong-Bae Lim & Domingo Ribeiro Soriano, 2009. "Suppliers’ Participation in a Single Buyer Electronic Market," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 18(5), pages 449-465, September.
    18. Lee, Ho & Kim, Moon Sun & Kim, Kyung Kyu, 2014. "Interorganizational information systems visibility and supply chain performance," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 285-295.
    19. Shawn A. Trivette, 2017. "Invoices on scraps of paper: trust and reciprocity in local food systems," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(3), pages 529-542, September.
    20. Sanjith Gopalakrishnan & Moksh Matta & Hasan Cavusoglu, 2022. "The Dark Side of Technological Modularity: Opportunistic Information Hiding During Interorganizational System Adoption," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 1072-1092, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01422789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.