IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00184524.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La mise en place et l'utilisation d'une méthode d'évaluation des coûts : le cas de la méthode UVA

Author

Listed:
  • O. de La Villarmois

    (UMR CNRS 8179 - Université de Lille, Sciences et Technologies - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Y. Levant

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • O. de La Villarmois & Y. Levant, 2005. "La mise en place et l'utilisation d'une méthode d'évaluation des coûts : le cas de la méthode UVA," Post-Print hal-00184524, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00184524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicolas Berland & Michel Gervais, 2008. "À quoi ont rêvé (et n’ont pas rêvé) les chercheurs en contrôle durant les dix dernières années? Dix ans de recherche en contrôle," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 11(Special), pages 109-148, June.
    2. Michel Gervais & Yves Levant, 2007. "Comment garantir l’homogénéité globale dans la méthode UVA ? Deux études de cas," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 10(3), pages 43-73, September.
    3. Olivier de La Villarmois & Yves Levant, 2007. "Le Time-Driven ABC:la simplification de l’évaluation des coûts par le recours aux équivalents–un essai de positionnement," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 10(1), pages 149-182, March.
    4. Olivier de La Villarmois & Yves Levant, 2010. "La mise en place et l'utilisation de la méthode UVA : une comparaison de deux enquêtes réalisées en 2001 et 2009," Post-Print hal-00476984, HAL.
    5. repec:dau:papers:123456789/1486 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00184524. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.