IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/grz/wpaper/2013-06.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Scenario Planning for Cities using Cellular Automata Models: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Bayr

    (Joanneum Research, Graz)

  • Miriam Steurer

    (Karl-Franzens University of Graz)

  • Rose-Gerd Koboltschnig

    (Joanneum Research, Graz)

Abstract

We show how small to medium sized cities can make use of the cellular automata (CA) approach to integrate land use data and other GIS based data with inter-active scenario evaluation. In our model development we put particular focus on the interdependency between transport infrastructure supply and population density. Due to their close connection with the field of Geography most CA models concentrate on land use changes only. How the CA model can be used in practice by city planners is generally not discussed. Also, population changes in cells and the associated pressures on infrastructure networks are generally not included. In this paper we first build and use a CA model to illustrate land use change. We then apply OLS regression as well as linear optimization techniques to allocate population growth into cells in a way that observes the stylized facts established by the standard Urban Economics literature (population growth in a particular cell is dependent on its distance to the city centre as well as its quality with respect to public transport ease). Third we show applications that illustrate how a CA model can be used for scenario planning in cities. Our CA model can be used to generate maps of future land use patterns for different potential future scenarios. It provides a fast and very economical way to compare alternative strategic plans and development rules for a small to medium sized city. For our sample town, Austria’s second largest city Graz, we develop five different long-term scenarios. The model output for each scenario can then be used as input for infrastructure planning procedures. We illustrate some examples: ex-ante transport infrastructure evaluation, graphic representation of the spatially differentiated structure of the population, evaluation of existing zoning rules, evaluation of infrastructure capacities (e.g. sewage system).

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Bayr & Miriam Steurer & Rose-Gerd Koboltschnig, 2013. "Scenario Planning for Cities using Cellular Automata Models: A Case Study," Graz Economics Papers 2013-06, University of Graz, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:grz:wpaper:2013-06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www100.uni-graz.at/vwlwww/forschung/RePEc/wpaper/2013-06.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caruso, Geoffrey & Peeters, Dominique & Cavailhes, Jean & Rounsevell, Mark, 2007. "Spatial configurations in a periurban city. A cellular automata-based microeconomic model," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 542-567, September.
    2. R White & G Engelen, 1993. "Cellular Automata and Fractal Urban Form: A Cellular Modelling Approach to the Evolution of Urban Land-Use Patterns," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 25(8), pages 1175-1199, August.
    3. repec:cor:louvrp:-1986 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. M Batty & Y Xie, 1994. "From Cells to Cities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 21(7), pages 31-48, December.
    5. Chris Hand, 2005. "Simple Cellular Automata on a Spreadsheet," Computers in Higher Education Economics Review, Economics Network, University of Bristol, vol. 17(1), pages 9-13.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yan Liu & Yongjiu Feng, 2016. "Simulating the Impact of Economic and Environmental Strategies on Future Urban Growth Scenarios in Ningbo, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Muhammad Hadi Saputra & Han Soo Lee, 2019. "Prediction of Land Use and Land Cover Changes for North Sumatra, Indonesia, Using an Artificial-Neural-Network-Based Cellular Automaton," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Dani Broitman & Daniel Czamanski, 2015. "Bursts and Avalanches: The Dynamics of Polycentric Urban Evolution," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 42(1), pages 58-75, February.
    4. Liu, Xiaoping & Li, Xia & Shi, Xun & Wu, Shaokun & Liu, Tao, 2008. "Simulating complex urban development using kernel-based non-linear cellular automata," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 211(1), pages 169-181.
    5. Nuno Norte Pinto & António Pais Antunes, 2010. "A Cellular Automata Model Based on Irregular Cells: Application to Small Urban Areas," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 37(6), pages 1095-1114, December.
    6. Ye Zhou & Feng Zhang & Zhenhong Du & Xinyue Ye & Renyi Liu, 2017. "Integrating Cellular Automata with the Deep Belief Network for Simulating Urban Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-19, October.
    7. Maria Plotnikova & Chokri Dridi, 2010. "A Cellular Automata Simulation of the 1990s Russian Housing Privatization Decision," Economics Discussion Papers em-dp2010-05, Department of Economics, University of Reading.
    8. Kwok Hung Lau & Booi Hon Kam, 2005. "A Cellular Automata Model for Urban Land-Use Simulation," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 32(2), pages 247-263, April.
    9. José I Barredo & Luca Demicheli & Carlo Lavalle & Marjo Kasanko & Niall McCormick, 2004. "Modelling Future Urban Scenarios in Developing Countries: An Application Case Study in Lagos, Nigeria," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 31(1), pages 65-84, February.
    10. Zackary B. Hawley & Geoffrey K. Turnbull, 2019. "Social Interaction and Urban Location Decisions," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 1-26, July.
    11. Caruso, Geoffrey & Peeters, Dominique & Cavailhes, Jean & Rounsevell, Mark, 2007. "Spatial configurations in a periurban city. A cellular automata-based microeconomic model," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 542-567, September.
    12. Qingxu Huang & Dawn C Parker & Tatiana Filatova & Shipeng Sun, 2014. "A Review of Urban Residential Choice Models Using Agent-Based Modeling," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 41(4), pages 661-689, August.
    13. Chen, Yong & Irwin, Elena G. & Jayaprakash, Ciriyam & Irwin, Nicholas B., 2017. "Market thinness, income sorting and leapfrog development across the urban-rural gradient," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 213-223.
    14. Giovanni A. Rabino & Lorenzo Papini & Silvana T. Lombardo & Antonio Colonna & Vittorio Di Stefano, 1998. "L.A.U.D.E: Learning Automata for Urban Development Exploration. The Case Study of Rome Urban System," ERSA conference papers ersa98p302, European Regional Science Association.
    15. Gong, Jian-zhou & Liu, Yan-sui & Xia, Bei-cheng & Zhao, Guan-wei, 2009. "Urban ecological security assessment and forecasting, based on a cellular automata model: A case study of Guangzhou, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(24), pages 3612-3620.
    16. Zambon, Ilaria & Serra, Pere & Grigoriadis, Efstathios & Carlucci, Margherita & Salvati, Luca, 2017. "Emerging urban centrality: An entropy-based indicator of polycentric development and economic growth," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 365-371.
    17. C J Webster & F Wu, 1999. "Regulation, Land-Use Mix, and Urban Performance. Part 1: Theory," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 31(8), pages 1433-1442, August.
    18. Michel Opelele Omeno & Ying Yu & Wenyi Fan & Tolerant Lubalega & Chen Chen & Claude Kachaka Sudi Kaiko, 2021. "Analysis of the Impact of Land-Use/Land-Cover Change on Land-Surface Temperature in the Villages within the Luki Biosphere Reserve," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-23, October.
    19. M Batty & Y Xie, 1994. "From Cells to Cities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 21(7), pages 31-48, December.
    20. repec:rre:publsh:v:33:y:2003:i:3:p:264-83 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Stephen M McCauley & John Rogan & James T Murphy & Billie L Turner & Samuel Ratick, 2015. "Modeling the Sociospatial Constraints on Land-Use Change: The Case of Periurban Sprawl in the Greater Boston Region," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 42(2), pages 221-241, April.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:grz:wpaper:2013-06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael Scholz (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vgrazat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.